BULLDOZER Mahathir cares two Fs whether the Azmin sex videos are real or fakes

Azmin thanks Dr M for standing by him in sex video affair

https://www.thesundaily.my/local/sex-video-a-political-stunt-says-mahathir-YH999111

Dr M rejects calls for Azmin to go on leave

BULLDOZER Mahathir cares two Fs whether the Azmin sex videos are real or fakes.

Azmin didn’t cross his path.

Besides, if two people are fighting each other, Mahathir will keep both. It’s called balance of terror for peaceful co-existence.

The BULLDOZER said the Azmin sex videos, “based on the self-confessed dick sucker’s accusations”, are fakes. That’s the end of the matter. Mahathir has declared the law. In any case, it’s not easy to prove the sex videos are genuine.

Azmin’s face in the first video looks like a picture. No expressions.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pixel

Pixels help weed out fake pictures and video content. Just use a small magnifying glass, like that used by a watchsmith or those looking at insects, to zoom in on the pixels.

MCMC will spring into action!

Azmin Ali should stop issuing statements on the sex videos.

Let the authorities concerned verify, if necessary, the sex videos.

Azmin should not give the impression that he’s easily rattled.

Azmin’s lawyers — hopefully they are not the kangkung type and/or loyar buruk — should advise their client that anything he says can be, may be, and will be, used against him.

No matter how much Azmin denies, there will still be many people who won’t believe him. They will be ready to believe the worst about him.

If he wants to “come clean”, he should issue a statement on his sexual preferences.

He will be applauded by all including the LGBTQF community.

Anwar Ibrahim has yet to issue a statement on his sexual preferences. Instead, he allegedly continues in a state of denial, buat “tak tahu”.

When the Azmin sex videos “surfaced” Anwar never issued any statement to say that he knows Azmin and believes him. Instead, he said he hopes Azmin’s family will be strong, “as his family was earlier”.

Internal plot . . .

If the sex videos are an internal PKR plot against Azmin, it will be the proverbial last straw that broke the camel’s back.

PKR will split into two.

Azmin will pull out of PKR with the majority of party lawmakers.

Investigative journalism . . .

We don’t see any investigative journalism on the Azmin sex videos by the local media.

They should get tips from The Sarawak Report Editor Clare Rewcastle-Brown, the wannabe Goddess of Investigative Journalism.

The media is degenerating from straight news reports into story telling and comment pieces based on rhetoric and polemics.

Story telling and such comment pieces don’t help make a difference.

They are just cheap entertainment based on titillating the senses.

Straight news reporting must be followed by investigative journalism and serious op-ed pieces.

Commentaries are just oral diarrhoea.

They stink to thy kingdom come.

While Mahathir is a loyalist, he’s also a user.

He will not put all his eggs in one basket.

Mahathir had no intention to make Azmin DPM or PM.

Malay politics is about families, not strangers.

Those behind the sex video just wasted their time.

Mahathir will have to delay his exit until things settle down and there’s the assurance that yet another scandal will not erupt before his retirement (again).

The issue that arises from the Sandakan sex video is what laws have been broken.

The accuser has accused himself. What does the law say on that?

Is he also going to prove the “truth” of his allegations in court? That’s the work of the prosecution, not the accused.

The “confession” of the accuser is meaningless with all his antics being denied by the other side.

There would probably be a defamation suit which, in law, will bury the accuser.

The police and the MACC can sit pretty.

Again, MCMC will prevent further sex videos being circulated.

The AG does not have to say anything.

What are the issues? Is the accuser saying the other side made the sex video without his knowledge and he’s mad over it? This claim on who made the video would be difficult to prove in court.

If the self-confessed cock sucker is upset because Azmin allegedly had the episodes video taped, how did he get hold of the “evidence”?

How can he prove Azmin was behind the sex videos? There’s no way that he can prove it.

If the sex videos turn out to be fakes, that’s the end of the matter for Azmin but not for the self-confessed cock sucker.

Was the accuser forced to suck somebody’s dick?

Did someone suck his dick without his permission?

Was he sucking someone’s dick while the other person was sucking his dick?

Did someone poke him in the backside hole with or without consent? Did he poke someone in the backside hole with or without consent?

All these should be clarified so that the authorities concerned can look for the law and point it out to the court.

The “confession” of the accuser is meaningless with all his antics being denied by the other side.

Who wants to stop Azmin’s rise, kill his career and/or move him out of the way?

Main Belakang?

Rafizi Ramli?

Nurul Izzah?

Others in PKR?

BULLDOZER?

Daim?

Mukhriz?

Jho Low?

People in Sarawak?

The sex videos was a rogue operation masterminded by those who had something to benefit.

Again, by Mahathir saying the video was “cooked up”, based on the accuser’s “confessions”, combined with MCMC action, the sex video issue will die down and eventually die out.

Update . . .

Haziq, the self-confessed cock sucker, is being investigated under four laws:

1. Section 292, Penal Code – Distribution of obscene materials.

Punishment: Maximum three years jail, a fine or both.

2. Section 504, Penal Code – Intentional insult with intent to provoke a breach of the peace.

Punishment: Maximum two years jail, a fine or both.

3. Section 377B, Penal Code – Carnal intercourse against the order of nature.

Punishment: Maximum 20 years jail and mandatory whipping.

4. Section 233, Communications and Multimedia Act 1998 – Producing content which is indecent, obscene, false, menacing, or offensive in character with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten or harass any person.

Punishment: Maximum one year jail, a maximum fine of RM50,000 or both.

Syariah . . .

https://www.malaymail.com/news/malaysia/2019/06/14/sodomy-accusation-without-providing-four-witnesses-is-a-qazaf-offence-says/1762280

Accusations in Sandakan, Kuching and where else?

Syariah is at the state level.

The AG decides whether to charge under civil law or syariah.

If he decides not to charge under civil law, then the syariah authorities in the state concerned can go ahead.

The syariah authorities have to take their cue from the AG.

Author: fernzthegreat

Joe Fernandez holds a honours degree in management, majoring in economics, and has opted from academia in law to being a jurist. He was trained professionally on the job as a journalist. He's a longtime Borneo watcher, keen on the history and legal aspects of Malaya's presence in Sabah and Sarawak. He teaches the English language privately and has emerged as a subject matter expert in public examination techniques.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: