PKR lodges police report on ‘Anwar not fit to be Prime Minister’

https://www.malaymail.com/news/malaysia/2019/06/21/pkr-leader-lodges-police-report-against-author-of-why-anwar-should-not-be-p/1764288

Wan Azizah, as DPM, should take over after BULLDOZER Mahathir.

If she can be appointed DPM, she’s qualified to be PM.

Alternatively, the BULLDOZER should die in office to ensure stability, and DPM Wan Azizah can take over after GE15.

Anwar, a perennial trouble creator dubbed Main Belakang by Islamists, never even had a plot to lose.

He never had any chance to be Prime Minister.

If he had any chance, he killed it a long time ago.

It’s Anwar who keeps harping in the media about him taking over from Mahathir. The Prime Minister should not humour him.

The Constitution decides on the appointment of the Prime Minister, not Mahathir.

The sex videos was a rogue operation masterminded by those who think they can benefit.

Anwar is a noted trouble creator.

Mahathir can forgive anything except disloyalty and stabbing in the back.

That’s why he never forgave Pairin.

Mahathir will never forgive Main Belakang.

Wan Azizah can’t insist that Main Belakang, her husband, replace her as DPM.

This is not family business.

Wan Azizah can quit if she wants. Main Belakang won’t replace her as DPM.

The Prime Minister has prerogative and discretionary powers. He can scrap the DPM post since it’s not in the Constitution.

Having a DPM sows the seeds of disunity since the holder will be tempted to challenge the PM and/or create trouble.

Tunku Abdul Rahman introduced the DPM post to ensure that the PM, after him, will continue to be Malay.

That’s unconstitutional.

The Constitution decides who will be PM.

Nowhere does it state that the PM must be Malay.

Mahathir will not hand over the Prime Minister’s post on a silver platter to anyone, especially to someone who cium tangan cium pantat the very people opposed to him (Mahathir) and rule of law.

Anwar would be intimidated into submission by the every people opposed to Mahathir and rule of law.

At present, except for less than half of PKR, reportedly no one supports Anwar’s bid for the premiership.

Mahathir conceded that he became Prime Minister because of DAP. So, why should Anwar be PM after Mahathir?

Anwar became irrelevant the moment Mahathir defected to then Opposition Pakatan Harapan (PH). It was because of Mahathir that PKR was formed.

Anwar has been talking about the Reform Agenda for the last 20 years but has never spelled it out.

According to media reports, Anwar wants to scrap anti-sodomy laws. Yet, he talks about Islamic values.

He supports LGBTQF (lesbians, gays, bisexuals, transgenders, queers, freaks) but has yet to come clean on his sexual preferences.

Borneo rights advocate Jeffrey Kitingan can confirm that Anwar Ibrahim is not fit to be Prime Minister of Malaya and Borneo.

Anwar was against an Orang Asal heading PKR Sabah. He stressed the PTI numbers in Sabah are Muslim and must also be considered in the political equation in the state.

Anwar has issued many anti-MA63, anti-Borneo, anti-Christian and anti-Orang Asal statements, privately and publicly.

Anwar is also anti-Indian and anti-Hindraf. His PKR was going nowhere until he jumped on the makkal sakthi bandwagon in 2008. In 2004, PKR won only Permatang Pauh and that too by only 100+ votes.

Muslims say their religion is against sodomy. So, they will not support Anwar to be Prime Minister after Mahathir. PAS and Hadi Awang have already said Anwar should not be Prime Minister.

Anyone who harps on Islam, and Melayu Melayu Melayu, is not fit to be Prime Minister of Malaysia.

Those who harp on Islam Islam Islam, Melayu Melayu Melayu, are only interested in plundering the public treasury through inflated gov’t contracts under the guise of bangsa, agama, negara and derma.

Lawmakers are sworn on Oath to uphold, respect, honour and defend the Constitution.

It’s a contradiction in terms to talk about defending Islam.

History . . .

History cannot be based on collective amnesia driven by taqiyya (deliberately lying) and kitman (lying by omission).

As Mahathir and Daim Zainuddin pointed out, it was Anwar who initiated Sodomy 1 by instructing his secretary to lodge a police report against a book of allegations against him. It has been claimed that Mahathir advised Anwar to lodge the police report. God alone knows the truth.

Instead of addressing the charges against him in Sodomy 1, Anwar chose to speak of the case as a political conspiracy. He did not provide any details. Justice Augustine Paul literally pleaded with Anwar not to politicise the charges.

Anwar refused to mitigate. So, the judge mitigated for him.

He was acquitted of sodomy upon appeal.

The corruption conviction, part of Sodomy 1, was upheld.

Blame his kangkung lawyers and/or loyar buruk. They failed to convince the Federal Court that he could not abuse powers when he didn’t have any over the police. He merely suggested to the police to close the Sodomy 1 file initiated by his secretary.

Mahathir initially dismissed the Sodomy 1 investigations. So, the police in fact closed the file. When Anwar refused to resign, the police re-opened the case. Anwar tried to stop the probe but failed to do so.

Matters worsened, on the day Anwar was sacked, when he challenged the “spineless authorities” during a press conference to charge him.

He refused to go away quietly after making a mess of the Finance Ministry. If not for the 1997/98 Asian Currency Crisis, Anwar would have survived politically.

The rest is history.

Anwar messed up every Ministry he headed.

He had never held a job after leaving Universiti Malaya, apparently with a pass degree in Malay Studies. Luckily, he married Wan Azizah who had a job. Anwar was in fact unemployed when Mahathir took him into Umno and the gov’t.

Sodomy 2 was allegedly a case of “old habits die hard”.

Again, he claimed the case was a political conspiracy against him. He provided some details this time but chose to make a statement from the dock. Since he was not cross examined, the test of the burden of proof shifted to the “balance of probabilities” (51/49) used in civil cases.

The Bar Council said in a statement after Sodomy 2 that there’s no law on a victimless offence. That may be the reason that Main Belakang was pardoned by the Agong.

The Federal Court in fact declared the law on victimless offence.

The rest is even more history.

Author: fernzthegreat

Joe Fernandez holds a honours degree in management, majoring in economics, and has opted from academia in law to being a jurist. He was trained professionally on the job as a journalist. He's a longtime Borneo watcher, keen on the history and legal aspects of Malaya's presence in Sabah and Sarawak. He teaches the English language privately and has emerged as a subject matter expert in public examination techniques.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: