After Syed Saddiq, Unity Minister Waytha Moorthy will invite Zakir Naik for banana leaf dinner, cium tangan, cium pantat, and beg his forgiveness demi Allah. Alhamdulillah!

Zakir Naik . . .

After Syed Saddiq, Unity Minister Waytha Moorthy will invite Zakir Naik for banana leaf dinner, cium tangan, cium pantat, and beg his forgiveness demi Allah. Alhamdulillah!

Just when you thought it was safe to go out, Syed Saddiq — the Yemeni from India — invites the hate preacher for dinner, kisses his hand, cium his pantat and begs his forgiveness . . .

Plight of Indians in Malaya . . .

Mahathir, the BULLDOZER, should realise that Waytha Moorthy, as Hindraf Makkal Sakthi chief, can only be Law Minister to address the plight of Indians in Malaya, including the 350, 000 stateless people and 850, 000 displaced estate workers.

“Stateless persons risk being deprived of access to basic rights and services that are often linked to nationality status, including access to education, health care and legal employment, the ability to buy or sell property, open bank accounts, or even get married. Statelessness can also lead to restrictions on freedom of movement and result in prolonged and arbitrary detention, as well as deportation,” UNHCR spokeswoman Liz Throssell tells This Week in Asia.

Waytha Moorthy, as Law Minister, should focus on the deviations and distortions of Article 153 and NEP.

The so-called Malays have violated the principle of “reasonable proportion” in Article 153 and the NEP. This is nothing but racism and internal colonisation.

The second prong of the Article mentions the legitimate interests/aspirations of non-Malays.

The first prong is about reasonable proportion, by way of a special position for the Orang Asal and so-called Malays, in only four areas viz. intake into the civil service; intake into institutions of higher learning owned by the gov’t and training opportunities; gov’t scholarships; and opportunities from the gov’t to do business.

Giving 90 per cent of matriculation seats to the so-called Malays is an unreasonable proportion. The so-called Malays formed only 50.4 per cent of the population in 2010, the last time the census was taken.

Article 153 has been deviated and distorted from reasonable proportion in the said four areas, to unreasonable proportion in the four areas, to unreasonable proportion in all walks of life.

Examples abound. For example, the canteens in all Klinik Kesihatan are run by so-called Malays. During puasa month, these canteens are closed. Non-Malays visiting the clinics can’t get even a drink.

Again, Indians in Malaya should focus on the deviations and distortions in the implementation of Article 153.

By focussing in this manner, Indians in Malaya can secure their legitimate interests/aspirations.

They have legitimate expectations.

Hindraf in the Cabinet . . .

I can represent Hindraf Makkal Sakthi in the Cabinet as the NGO’s de facto Adviser and one who helped shed its “Tamil Tiger terrorist” image.

Unity Minister Waytha Moorthy is probably insane as he wants to be another Samy Vellu. He keeps repeating the same mistakes in the hope that he can get different and better results. That’s proof of insanity.

Insanity is not a medical, but legal term. Only a court can declare a person insane. Such persons will be institutionalised for life to keep the public from harm.

Mahathir is a failure. He has been a failure in everything he set out to do. Still, he’s not deterred. He’s probably insane since he keeps repeating the same mistakes in the hope that he can get different and better results. That’s proof of insanity.

Mahathir has embarked on even more failures . . . 3rd national car, Malaysia Airlines, English language, Waytha Moorthy’s Malaysian Advancement Party (MAP) for Indians to replace MIC etc etc. MIC has become a PAS slave.

Definition of Malay . . .

The theory that the so-called Malays in Malaya have conceded too much to “racists” does not hold water.

In fact, it can be proven that the only racists in Malaysia are the so-called Malays in Malaya.

The so-called Malays in Malaya are the last people on Earth to read the Constitution.

They prefer to take to the streets, beating their chests in unison, pulling at their hair and screaming hysterically “Allahuakbar” with tears streaming down their faces.

Have they ever read the Definition of Malay in Article 160?

Briefly, the Definition in the 2nd prong holds that Muslims able to speak Malay, and either born or domiciled in Singapore or Malaya, by Merdeka 31 Aug 1957, are Malay.

Their descendants are also Malay.

This is an artificial construct, an aberration in law. In short, it’s bad law.

Bad law is not law. It does not exist as law as if it never existed.

How can the people in the 2nd prong habitually practise the so-called Malay culture, customs and traditions in the 1st prong when they don’t exist as a race?

Patently, the Definition is not about DNA, race, history, geographical origin, Natekaran, Valiangkati, First Nation people, Orang Asal, Indigenous, Aborigine, Native, rumpun Melayu, Kepulauan Melayu, Nusantara, Archipelago or Austronesian.

Hence, again, it’s a contradiction in terms to speak in the Definition’s 1st prong of those in the 2nd prong practising Malay culture, customs, and traditions.

If ever a Malay people existed in the Archipelago, i.e. speaking the Malay language as their mother tongue, it’s not reflected under the 2nd prong in the Definition of Malay in Article 160 of the Federal Constitution.

There’s no evidence of a Malay race, so to speak, speaking only Malay. Every Malay speaker, i.e. those classified as Malay, has his mother tongue i.e. Malayalam, Tamil, Bugis, Minang etc

Generally, the Malays in Article 160 are Tamil, Malayalee, Pathan, Yemeni and Turks (only adherents of Islam among these communities, from India, were re-classified as Malays); and Bugis, Javanese, Minang, and Aceh (only adherents of Islam among these communities, from what is now known as Indonesia, were re-classified as Malays).

Language is no proof of race. I speak English as my primary language. That doesn’t make me an Englishman.

The Malay language was the lingua franca in the Archipelago before the advent of the West in the region.

Lingua franca means a language used by various communities, all having their mother tongues, to communicate with each other in a common medium.

The Malay language has also been carried to the Cocos Keeling Islands, Sri Lanka, South Africa, and Surinam in Latin America.

The first people in Malaya . . .

The so-called Malays defined in Article 160 were not the first people in Malaya.

The British colonialists seized Orang Asli land in Malaya to create gov’t reserves by gazette.

Some of these reserves were given to Muslim squatters, labelled Malay for administrative reasons, to get them out of the way where the British wanted to plant rubber and mine tin.

The Malays referred to these gov’t reserves as “tanah Melayu”.

Tanah Melayu is a misnomer for Orang Asli land the British seized to create gov’t reserves.

Besides Article 8, the Orang Asli in Malaya can also refer to Article 5 “right to life” and Article 13 on “property rights”.

The Orang Asli came 40, 000 years before the Malayan gov’t. The Negrito (Semang) came from Kerala, south west India.

The Malayan gov’t cannot claim, in law, that the Orang Asli are squatting on state land.

The Orang Asli have Adat, based on customary practices, which has force of law.

Adat is international law.

Again, the Orang Asal came first. The gov’t came much later, hundreds and even thousands of years later. The gov’t, for example, cannot pass legislation to state that the Orang Asal are squatting on state land. Law cannot be backdated.

Article 5 of the Constitution guarantees the “right to life” and property rights. No one’s property can be acquired by the state without compensation. The state can only acquire property for public purposes, not for private use.

Read the stories here . . .

Read further . . .

Author: fernzthegreat

Joe Fernandez holds a honours degree in management, majoring in economics, and has opted from academia in law to being a jurist. He was trained professionally on the job as a journalist. He's a longtime Borneo watcher, keen on the history and legal aspects of Malaya's presence in Sabah and Sarawak. He teaches the English language privately and has emerged as a subject matter expert in public examination techniques.

10 thoughts on “After Syed Saddiq, Unity Minister Waytha Moorthy will invite Zakir Naik for banana leaf dinner, cium tangan, cium pantat, and beg his forgiveness demi Allah. Alhamdulillah!”

    1. LTTE is history. Buried by New Delhi once and for all.

      LTTE is about an independent Tamil homeland in north and east Sri Lanka.

      East Sri Lanka is also Muslim.

      Only a Malayalee can save Tamils in Malaya, Tamils are their own worst enemy.

      I am trying to save the Tamils from themselves, Waytha Moorthy and Uthaya Kumar are trying to make things difficult.


      1. Same can be said about any race or language

        Muslim is found all across Sri Lanka and from all ethnic groups. There are lots of Tamil Muslims too, but are still Tamil. So I fail to understand what you mean by saying there is Muslim in east? LTTE was about a Tamil homeland, that includes all religions including Christians and Muslims. Lots of LTTE members were /are also Catholics.

        2. Malayalee saving Tamils from Tamils…then who will save Malayalee in Malaysia? You think the system only discriminates against Tamils alone?


      2. True, there are lots of Yemeni Arab traders who settled in Sri Lanka, but there are also local converts to Islam from Tamil and Singhalese communities and intermarriages too.

        You are still dodging the question

        if Malayalee is to save Tamil in Malaysia, who is going to save the Malayalee? Malayalee certainly has not been able to escape the discrimination laws in Malaysia have they?


  1. What is wrong with Tamil Tiger image? Why are you so worried about tamil tiger image? what is wrong if Hindraf has Tamil Tiger image? Tamil tigers were feared and respected around the world. They whoopped the Ar@@# of Sinhalese Buddhists and Rajiv Gandhi and Indian Peace keeping force. So what is wrong with it? P Ramasamy supports Tamil Tigers. Most tamils in Malaysia are supportive of Tamil tigers. Why not you? why was there a need for you to make hindraf “shed” Tamil tiger image? Why? Don’t dodge this question. Front up and answer honestly.


    1. If the Tamil Tiger terrorist image was not shed, Hindraf Makkal Sakthi would not have been invited by THIEF Najib to join the BN gov’t.

      BULLDOZER too was impressed with Hindraf.

      It was also necessary to shed the racist image.


      1. Tamil Tiger is not terrorist. Who told you that? Tamil Tigers only protected innocent people. They never did any harm to anyone. Hindraf never made any statement disowning or owning Tamil Tigers. Most in Hindraf are supportive of Tamil Tigers. You are still dodging the question after partial answer.


        1. The US and many countries declared Tamil Tigers a terrorist organisation.

          I have already answered why it was necessary for Hindraf Makkal Sakthi to shed its Tamil Tiger terrorist image.

          It was also necessary to shed the racist image.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: