Whites discriminate on basis of facial features, not skin colour

There’s no reason for a white-skinned Caucasian girl to look at the colour of an Indian’s dick before spreading her legs. Their children will still look Caucasian.

In the case of Negroes and Chinese (Mongoloid), the white-skinned Caucasian girl will put on her chastity belt, put off by their ugly facial features.

Fair-skinned Indians discriminate against dark-skinned Indians. This happens even within the same family.

Indians are the most colour-conscious people in the world.

That’s why skin bleaching and whitening lotions and creams do well in India.

Many even resort to high dosage Vitamin C injections to lighten the complexion.

Caucasian — anything from white to dark-skinned — means people who don’t have Negro or Chinese (Mongoloid) facial features.

Caucasoids, archaic Caucasians, were the first Caucasians.

Indians are a mix of Caucasoids and Caucasians. Indians in northeast India are descended from Mongoloid tribes. There are Negrito tribes in the mountains of Kerala, southwest India. Some of their ancestors left for the mountains of Malaya 40K years ago.

Malaysia ruled by corruption, those with money don’t face discrimination.

Whites discriminate on the basis of facial features, not skin colour.

COMMENT / Buying into the fallacy of racial hierarchy.


Those who have paper qualifications and skills for the workplace will always have a place in western societies. The brightest and best lead the way for All.

Other societies, Malaysia for example, are plagued by nepotism, cronyism, collusion, corruption and institutionalised racism i.e. the state is racist.

The riff raff squat on the brightest and best under the guise of quota systems based on the lowest common denominator.

The gov’t claims it’s liberalising and democratising the system.

In fact, it’s a violation of the “reasonable proportion” principle and legitimate interests and expectations in Article 153.

The NEP, based on restructuring society to eliminate the identification of race with economic function and place of residence, degenerated like Article 153 into a sapu bersih instrument of state racism. Pink share forms linked to 30 per cent ownership of the publicly listed sector was hijacked by a small group of capitalists. The ownership percentage has reportedly been breached.

Those who have money will do well in countries like Malaysia, for example, because they are ruled by corruption.

The Bangla, Pakistani and Indonesians, among others, do well in Malaysia because they have learnt to grease the right palms. A parallel system exists for them outside the data bank.

Having said that, otherwise dominant characteristics dominate and decide everything in western societies, for example.

In inbreeding, the recessive characteristics — low intelligence, lack of energy, bad luck — come to the surface. The dominant characteristics — above average intelligence, high energy and luck — are hidden.

Black woes in a white society can be better explained if we look at the inbreeding phenomenon.

If blacks were not inbred, they would not look inbred, or at least so inbred. I am not referring to colour but facial features. Apparently, among the whites, unlike poles repel, when it comes to facial features.

Unlike blacks, white Americans are not obsessed with colour. Indian-Americans for example, no matter how dark, are considered by whites as “fellow Caucasians” and “one of us”.

Whites discriminate on the basis of facial features, not skin colour. Many whites in fact like to tan themselves dark in the sun.

The Brahmin, for example, and the Dalit (casteless/outcaste or Pariah, Harijan) have the same DNA.

The Brahmin have been using the Dalit as sex slaves for centuries.

It happens even today in India. No charges are filed against a Brahmin who rapes a Dalit. The higher castes make up the police in India.

The Brahmin and higher castes insist the Pariah massage them and give them blow jobs.

So, in a way, the evil caste system is about sexual exploitation.

Prominent scientist Dr Shiva Ayyadurai, a Pariah from India who is quite dark, tried to identify with the black community in MA. The whites told him that “no one will accept him as black since he didn’t have Negro features”.

TV star Mindy Kaling’s brother, also Indian-American and quite dark, tried to get into medical college under the 69 per cent quota reserved for blacks. Except for two colleges, the other nearly 30 colleges rejected him.

The two colleges rejected him when he turned up looking very Indian.

He wrote a book on his experiences. He said Africans, not local blacks, took up most of the seats reserved under the 69 per cent quota. Local blacks, apparently, can’t meet the minimum standards required.

So, if blacks in the US don’t have Negro faces, they would be more acceptable in a white society. The only way that blacks would not have Negro faces would be if they were not inbred and thereby have above average intelligence and energy. If the inbred blacks resort to plastic surgery, it would still not help overcome their lack of intelligence and energy caused by inbreeding.

Chinese in America, or Australia for that matter, face the same problem as the blacks.

Their facial features put off the whites and invite racial discrimination.

Chinese are plagued by inbreeding under the clan system. They can’t compete with Indians, for example, in the US. A Chinese student made a YouTube video on this phenomenon.

Apparently, many Chinese outside the Chinatowns in America resort to plastic surgery to alter their features in a desperate attempt to win acceptance by white society.

The most intelligent and energetic people among the Hindu in India are in fact the casteless/outcaste (Pariah/Dalit/Harijan).

The casteless/outcaste (Pariah/Dalit/Harijan) are outside the evil caste system. They can only escape their so-called karma by leaving Hinduism.

The evil caste system is based on the law of karma, cause and effect.

Karma (input) is in fact neutral. Karmic (output) forces exhaust themselves sooner or later.

So, why should there be artificial prohibition on upward social mobility under the evil caste system?

It’s also part of the law of karma that “the clear energy” must not be blocked.

Under the evil caste system which plague the Hindu, no one is allowed to marry outside the caste. Those who break the taboo are declared casteless/outcaste (Pariah/Dalit/Harijan).

Brahmin (priest caste, the highest) are also declared casteless/outcaste (Pariah/Dalit/Harijan) if they “cross the waters”.

Some Brahmin in America have argued that they didn’t cross the waters but flew. That’s ridiculous! They want to have the cake and eat it too. In flying, they still cross the waters.

Under the evil caste system, there are no Brahmin in America, only Pariah. It appears that 70 per cent of Indian MPs are Brahmin. Since, almost all of them crossed the waters, they are no longer Brahmin but Pariah.

Brahmin form 12m of India’s 1.2b population.

Yet, besides 70 per cent of Indian MPs, they make up 90 per cent of the national media, and 100 per cent of temple priests. The temples control a lot of land, gold and jewellery donated by the people.

Unlike the four fold evil caste system in north India which has a pecking order, the three-fold system in south India is egalitarian. In any case, south Indians have always been more intelligent than north Indians because there’s less inbreeding. If the south is about brains, the north has always been about brawns.

Even so, inbreeding remains the most serious problem created by the evil caste system among Hindu, whether north or south.

Of course, the inbred in India — read caste Hindu including Brahmin — should not go to America. They would not have the intelligence and energy to equip themselves with an education and skills for the marketplace.

Author: fernzthegreat

Joe Fernandez holds a honours degree in management, majoring in economics, and has opted from academia in law to being a jurist. He was trained professionally on the job as a journalist. He's a longtime Borneo watcher, keen on the history and legal aspects of Malaya's presence in Sabah and Sarawak. He teaches the English language privately and has emerged as a subject matter expert in public examination techniques.

4 thoughts on “Whites discriminate on basis of facial features, not skin colour”

      1. The Supreme Court in United States v. Bhagat Singh Thind (1923) decided that Asian Indians were ineligible for citizenship because, though deemed “Caucasian” anthropologically, they were not white like European descendants since most laypeople did not consider them to be “white” people.

        This represented a change from the Supreme Court’s earlier opinion in Ozawa v. United States, in which it had expressly approved of two lower court cases holding “high caste Hindus” to be “free white persons” within the meaning of the naturalization act.

        Government lawyers later recognized that the Supreme Court had “withdrawn” this approval in Thind.

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: