JPN should explain if Zahid Hamidi holds Malay MyKad


Malaysian parliamentary Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim is clearly trying to save the Javanese, Zahid Hamidi, with the allegedly bogus Malay MyKad. He must be holding a Malay MyKad, definately bogus, since he’s Umno President. We can’t simply look the other way on the issue.

The audio appears genuine unless proven otherwise in court based on subject matter expert testimony.

The voices in the audio belong to Anwar and Zahid.

What is bogus is Zahid’s Malay MyKad. His MyKad, if he’s eligible to get it, and entitled to hold it, should read Lain Lain.

Apparently, in Zahid’s own words as well on TV in Indonesia not so long ago, he came to Malaya in 1965 i.e. after Merdeka, 31 Aug 1957, the cutoff line to be classified as Malay in S’pore and Malaya. The descendants of those classified as Malay in S’pore and Malaya are Malay.

Read the Definition of Malay in Article 160(2). Both 1st Prong and 2nd Prong should be read together, not in isolation or separately. If the 1st Prong is read in isolation, i.e. separately and/or not together with the 2nd Prong, every Tom, Dick and Harry in Malaysia would be classified Malay as long as they are Muslim.

The INTENTION of the Framers of the Constitution on the Definition of Malay in Article 160(2) is clear when the 2nd Prong is read with or without reference to the 1st Prong.

In short, all Malay in Malaya are Muslim, not all Muslim in Malaya are Malay.

Malay in Article 160(2) is not race but a form of identity. The Constitution is colour blind. There’s case law on Malay in Article 160(2). The case law states Malay is not race but anthropology.

In fact, the case law itself is partly flawed.

If anthropology, it can only refer to the Archipelago called Malay Archipelago after the Malay language, the lingua franca of the region. There’s a Malay language, but no Malay race.

That means Islam should not be mentioned in the Malay Defnition and those Muslims “originating” from outside the Archipelago, at least more recently, should not be classified as Malay under Article 160(2).

This is fraught with any number of legal difficulties and complications. The people in the Archipelago, like those in southeast Asia, in fact originate in DNA from south India and Afghanistan via south China. This is about race.

However, as the case law itself says about the Malay Definition in Article 160(2), and as evident in the Malay Definition in Article 160(2), Malay is not race.

S’pore, after independence from M’sia in 1965, amended its Definition of Malay in Article 152 to exclude Islam i.e. a Malay in S’pore can leave Islam and still remain Malay. In Malaya, a Malay ceases to be Malay if he or she leaves Islam.

The reality is that the syariah court in Malaya will not allow a Malay to leave Islam. An alternative would be for a Malay in Malaya, wishing to leave Islam, to correct his or her IC at JPN to replace Malay with Lain Lain and religion with Bebas, tiada maklumat or Hindu.

It may not be advisable, in law, to replace with Christian or Buddhist. Sikh, a variation of Hinduism, does not make sense. Buddhism, according to the Indian Constitution, is a variation of Hinduism, being an Indic religion.

There’s no Malay in Sabah. Bahasa Sabah is a local version of Bahasa Melayu.

Many Muslim Orang Asal in Sabah, and the PTI, are allegedly holding Malay MyKad. This can be inferred from the Other Bumiputera and Malay classifications used in Sabah by the Statistics Dept in the Census 2010 and the Election Commission in the electoral rolls.

Banks in M’sia can verify whether a MyKad is genuine i.e. as a physical specimen. They can’t read the chip or confirm that the holder is eligible to get it, and entitled to hold it. Astro Channel 800 used to offer the MyKad chip reading facility. It has since been taken away. No explanation has been offered.

Police at roadblocks carry MyKad readers. This may be like that used by banks. Ironically, the police readers can detect bogus driving licences even if the physical specimen is genuine.

Barunai (Brunei Malay) in Sabah and Sarawak are classified as Lain Lain (Barunai, Brunei Malay) or simply Lain Lain in the MyKad.

I don’t know how they are classified in Brunei. Barunai are in fact Iban. The Iban and Dusun are the Orang Asal in Brunei. I don’t know whether they have NCR land.

Sarawak Malay (Orang Laut or Kirieng speaking a mixture of Iban and local version of Bahasa Melayu) are under Article 161A. They are sea gypsies.

The Sarawak Malay are not considered Orang Asal since they don’t have NCR land.

In fact, they should not be in Article 161A. The Constitution is colour blind. Article 161A is not about race but NCR land.

Note on Bahasa Melayu, Bahasa Malaysia . . .

Again, Malay is a language, not race as well. There’s no Malay race in the world i.e. an ethnic group which originated the language.

In history, Malay was created by Hindu and Buddhist from India as the lingua franca of the Archipelago, hence Malay Archipelago. They used it for trade, missionary activities, education and administration.

The original Malay script was Indian as in Myanmar, Thailand, Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam. The French changed the script in Vietnam to Roman. China, which never developed writing, continued to use characters.

Malay was based on a Cambodian dialect, Tamil, Sanskrit and Pali.

Malay in Tamil and Malayalam means hill/mountain. Malayalam, the language of the Malayalee in Kerala in southwest India, means hilly/mountainous world.

Malayalee, in Malayalam and Tamil, means people (alee) of the hills/mountains (Malay).

Malaya is an English word from Malay, Tamil and Malayalam for hill/mountain.

Bahasa (it means language in Sanskrit) Malaysia is based on Bahasa Melayu — Johor, Rhio, Lingga version — local languages and dialects and English and rendered in Baku (written as spoken).

NOTE: the word sea gypsy is not in Article 161A.

The gypsies entered Europe from Egypt. Hence, they were called gypsy. The gypsy in fact originated from India. They trekked to Egypt.

Read further here . . .

North Borneons, Sarawakians, can’t be Malaysians forever bah!

Malaya go its Way, ‘We’ — North Borneo, Sarawak — go OUR WAY!

Blessed Easter, God bless, take care, stay safe . . .

Church gathering of the faithful for readings from the Holy Bible, the Word of God, in memory of Jesus.

NGO calls for Federal court to resolve status of Sabah, Sarawak, in Malaysia.

Putrajaya has no ‘political will’ to comply with Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63).

Media should educate people on ‘proof of identity’.

There are many people in M’sia living in the legal twilight zone.

Human rights advocate wants ex-judge Sri Ram to clarify on Shafie Apdal, Musa Aman.

Daniel John Jambun opines jury still not out on whether Shafie Apdal illegitimate CM on 12 May 2018.

Sun mass BEST Way Forward on grammar, comprehension, speaking skills!

The Church, all over the world, has kept local dialects and languages alive.

Orang Asal NO to PTI say in Sabah, M’sia!

Sabah, Sarawak, will not support PAS or PTI party taking PM’s post.

Jambun: Musa Aman move in Federal court to thwart Shafie Apdal being ‘declared’ CM.

“Now, we don’t know what will become of Musa’s Constitutional questions on Sabah in the Federal court.”

Jambun decries MA63 activist Zainnal Ajamain’s ‘veiled threat’ on ‘defensive’ Malay.

Human rights advocate and Borneo rights activist wants to focus on Definition of Malay in Article 160(2) ‘to clear the air’ in Sabah, Sarawak.

If JPN has dropped Malay MyKads, no way to determine Muslim who are Malay!

If no Malay on the chip, Article 160(2) redundant, Article 153 partly redundant.

Malay, suffering from inferiority complex, need somebody to look down!

Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka Malay run amok in Kamus Dewan with Tambi, Keling, Pariah.

Human rights advocate seeks court Declaration on NRD handing out Malay MyKad ‘indiscriminately’.

Daniel John Jambun wants NRD to comply with Definition of Malay in Article 160(2).

Muslim, Malay, failed to Declare on Allah in Christian Malay print!

The Orang Asal in Borneo in fact say Allah Taala in their various dialects and languages.

Jambun: Allah not for politics in Sabah, Sarawak.

Human rights advocate does not want Church to be challenged on Allah issue.

Malaysia not tanah Melayu . . . Tanah Melayu misnomer for gov’t reserves British created on Orang Asli land.

The Anglo-Siamese Treaty, signed in 1909, saw Bangkok give up the southern half of the Kra Peninsula to Britain.

Author: fernzthegreat

Joe Fernandez holds a honours degree in management, majoring in economics, and has opted from academia in law to being a jurist. He was trained professionally on the job as a journalist. He's a longtime Borneo watcher, keen on the history and legal aspects of Malaya's presence in Sabah and Sarawak. He teaches the English language privately and has emerged as a subject matter expert in public examination techniques.

One thought on “JPN should explain if Zahid Hamidi holds Malay MyKad”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: