REALITY . . . Islam, communism, incompatible with Federal Constitution!

https://www.umlawreview.com/lex-in-breve/after-maria-chin-imagining-the-posthumous-revival-of-judicial-review-under-the-rule-of-law-doctrine

It’s not possible for anyone to know the law.

Law exists, and has always existed, based on common sense, universal values and the principles of natural justice.

According to jurisprudence, God is not a source in law.

Law must have source to have jurisdiction, authority and power.

Law is about regulating human relationships.

It’s about the relationship between God/state and a people, between God/state and individuals, and between individuals.

The Holy Bible, the Word of God, is about the spiritual nature of truth.

Word of God refers to eternal laws on eternal truths. These have a spiritual nature.

The laws on Energy, gravity and aerodynamics, among others, is about the Word of God.

Jesus explained Faith and Truth. Both were not about God as in individual, person, ego, I or religion but Word of God.

Sanatana (science) dharma (duties), not synonymous with Hinduism, claims it’s about eternal laws based on eternal truths. Sanatana Dharma does not say these are the Word of God. The 1st Law in Sanatana Dharma is Karma (input) which invites karmic forces (output).

Karmic forces exhaust themselves sooner or later.

Brahmin preach, in a contradiction in terms, that artificial prohibition on upward social mobility, under the evil caste system, is justified by the theories on reincarnation, past lives, Karma from past lives, and related BS. These theories are based on superstitious notions of Karma.

The gross human body is not “us”.

The gross human body is heritage from two cells. It went on to gather the energy of the sun through Mother Nature on Earth. It must be returned to Mother Nature when it’s time runs through aging, inflamation, degeneration, the immune system losing its memories on exposures and infections, sepsis, complications, systemic failure, prolonged protracted illness and coma, and old age.

“We” are the undifferentiated consciousness trapped in space and time in the gross human body as differentiated consciousness.

When the gross human body returns to Mother Earth, the differentiation is no more, and the consciousness is undifferentiated in nothingness or heaven or nirvana (eternal bliss).

The differentiated consciousness may not realise immediately that the gross human body has returned to Mother Earth. It may take anything up to two weeks.

In the first three days, it’s possible for the gross human body to come to “life” again and “live” for a few hours, few days, few weeks, even a few years. This “return” can happen a few times unless “medical errors” prevent the gross human body continuing. About 60 per cent of other causes of death are due to medical errors.

The greatest doctors in science are those who can indefinately prevent the gross human body returning to Mother Earth prematuredly.

After “life”, the consciousness may linger for a while in the differentiated form as a ghost, after the gross human body returns to Mother Earth. It may be in “great distress”, again for only a while, as being not undifferentiated, it does not know what’s happening. This while may seem like an eternity in Hell.

It’s the guilty conscience that kills. Those who block the “clear energy” will be moved out of the way by the Karma.

The conscience must be clear to enter a state of grace, i.e. sin-free, for blessings of God as seen in miracles.

It’s human perceptions that see Karma as this and that. Karma is neutral, created by the individual or by others in response.

Anything that can help regulate human relationships, without being inconsistent with superior law, is law provided it has source.

Law, ultimately, is about the power of language.

Opinion is not law.

Only the court can declare law.

The court is only about law.

The court is not about ethics, moral values, theology, sin, God, justice or truth.

It’s the court that can bring closure to issues in conflict between parties in dispute.

Once a case has closed, the court will not allow re-opening, only a new Trial but the previous one must be set aside.

A party in dispute can Appeal twice from the court of 1st instance but only on errors in facts and errors in law.

Leave must be granted.

Leave can be denied if it cannot be demonstrated that errors in facts and errors in law arise. Having said that, the court generally does not deny leave.

The Basic Features Doctrine, implied if not stated, is clear in the Constitution.

M’sia, unlike the UK, has a written/codified Constitution.

Hence, it’s subject to Constitutional supremacy.

The sovereignty of Parliament is limited to five years. No Parliament can be bound by a previous Parliament or bind a future Parliament.

Again, Parliament in M’sia is subject to the supremacy of the Constitution.

The Constitution cannot go against itself.

The rule of law is the basis of the Constitution.

The letter of the law is not the sum total of the rule of law. There’s greater emphasis on the spirit of the law in the rule of law. The letter of the law by itself is not law at all but rule BY law as in China, and hence the law of the jungle, rule by men, and dictatorship. There’s no democracy.

The people of China have lost their sovereignty to a handful of rule BY law communists in Beijing.

The people have no choice via multiparty elections, there’s no consent of the governed, the gov’t has no legitimacy.

China, under the CCP, has become a grave threat to global security.

Beijing does not recognise international law, free speech, freedom of conscience, freedom of association except the freedom to join the Communist Party but admission is not automatic, and human rights, among others.

International law, as claimed by Beijing, is not arbitarily imposed by a few nations but based on international customary practices.

Human rights is the basis of international law.

International law has basis in national law and must be incorporated once the threshold of signatories is reached and a nation has signed it for ratification.

There must be regime change in China.

Under international law, it’s the duty of the international community to restore the sovereignty of a people who have lost it.

The coalition of the willing can first impose a sanctions regime on China to bring about regime change. Beijing fears this and has since introduced digital currency, a digital version of the yuan which is worse than shithouse paper, plagued by a lack of confidence arising from the lack of rule of law.

Islam, like the Communist Party, does not recognise international law, free speech, freedom of conscience, freedom of association except the freedom to join Islam and admission is automatic but there’s no freedom to leave except through death or being killed, and human rights, among others.

The supreme court of India, in refusing to ban Syariah, said it’s not law but based on a person’s willingness to accept it.

The court cautioned that it would be unconstitutional to impose syariah on anyone.

Islam is not law but based on the concept of sin.

No law, no crime.

Author: fernzthegreat

Joe Fernandez holds a honours degree in management, majoring in economics, and has opted from academia in law to being a jurist. He was trained professionally on the job as a journalist. He's a longtime Borneo watcher, keen on the history and legal aspects of Malaya's presence in Sabah and Sarawak. He teaches the English language privately and has emerged as a subject matter expert in public examination techniques.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: