BREAKING NEWS . . . Sabah hawker queries ‘novel gene therapy’ disguised as ‘vaccine’ . . .

Sabah Discovery Application may uncover daily Covid-19 deaths confirmed by post-mortem.

Subject matter experts can advise High Court of Borneo on ‘novel gene therapy’ disguised as ‘vaccine’.

OPINION . . . Mandatory vaccination and masking, to digress a little before delving further, were raised in the US Supreme Court recently by the gov’t in Washington. The court may have probably been inconclusive on the grounds that “vaccination” and masking do not prove anything.

The daily death rates, worldwide and in Malaysia, may feature significantly in two vaccination cases, the first in the High Court of Borneo, and another in the High Court of Malaya. The death rates related to Covid-19 vs other causes of deaths may help the court keep the pandemic in perspective.

The real figures on the daily Covid-19 related deaths are with the gov’t. Anyone can file Discovery Application for these figures. The figures would have to be backed up by post-mortem. The gov’t so far, based on media reports, keeps changing the story. There’s no control of the Narrative.

Obviously, in better understanding the judicial review cases, the court will seek subject matter expert opinion on non-Covid-19 related deaths and deaths caused solely by the novel Corona virus finishing off an uncertain number of people, whether with co-morbidities or otherwise.

Daily deaths before pandemic . . .

Already, even before Covid-19 emerged in 2019, global mortality figures show that 28, 036 people were dying daily in China, 25, 270 in India, 7, 564 in the US, 5, 013 in Russia, and lesser numbers in other countries. Malaysia recorded 678 deaths daily before the pandemic. Visit . . .

The judicial review cases . . .

Discharged Sergeant Wan Ramli Wan Seman, formerly with the Royal Army Regiment’s 24th battalion in Rasah Camp, Negeri Sembilan, applied for leave in Kuala Lumpur on Mon 27 Sept to file judicial review. It’s not known when the case will be heard.

Wan Ramli was reportedly discharged from the Army on Wed 4 Aug for refusing to be vaccinated against Covid-19, the disease brought by the novel Corona virus.

Under the Federal Constitution, a job is the property of the worker. Article 5 provides the “right to life”, Article 8 states equality under the law and no discrimination, Article 13 protects property rights.

In Sabah, Ranau hawker Naomi @ Neomi Francis, 55, applied for leave on Sun 26 Sept to initiate judicial review on the territorial gov’t’s announcement that, under the Prevention and Control of Infectious Diseases 1988, only fully vaccinated persons, including business owners and staff, would be allowed to enter premises from Tues 21 Sept. The case will be heard in late Oct. Thereafter the matter will become subjudice, being under judicial consideration. Errant parties can be cited for contempt of court. Unlike in America, for example, there’s no trial by jury in M’sia.

The two cases probably won’t be settled at the High Court. They may go all the way to the Federal Court. Both Applicants seek various Declarations and Orders. They can plead no costs since it’s public litigation, a matter of public concern and public interest.

35 Pages in court . . .

It’s evident from a 35-page document in court in Kota Kinabalu that the Sabah hawker has raised various issues which will only get a hearing if the High Court visits the merits of the judicial review Application.

The Applicant argues that some of the vaccines for Covid-19 did not meet the criteria. Pfizer-BionTech and Moderna, for example, were strictly not vaccines but “novel gene therapy technology”. Both approaches, it appears, don’t provide immunity but may help reduce the severity of symptoms attributed to Covid-19. The other “vaccines” aren’t mentioned in the judicial review, probably being “work in progress”.

The Applicant argues that it’s not possible to produce a vaccine within less than 10 to 15 years. A vaccine introduces antibodies for lifelong immunity i.e. protection. It’s not possible to be infected after being vaccinated.

She further argues that taking a shorter timeframe may create more virulent strains, neurological consequences, brain damage, hemorrhage and premature death including among the young.

Nuremberg Code . . .

The Applicant goes into detail on the 10-Point Nuremberg Code. These are a set of research ethics principles for human experimentation. It was created by the U.S. v Brandt court as one result of the Nuremberg trials at the end of the 2nd World War.

The hawker takes issue with vaccines, vaccination, the PCR Test being unable to detect the presence of the virus if a fragment of its RNA isn’t present, and the symptoms attributed to Covid-19 being generally not specific to the disease.

Subject matter experts can help confirm the various claims in the judicial review. Visit . . .

Generally, the court will not consider conspiracy theories. If there’s proof and evidence, based on the balance of probabilities in the civil Test of the Burden of Proof, it would be a different matter. In civil cases, circumstantial evidence is accepted in court.

The High Court of Borneo will first consider whether the Majlis Daerah Ranau complied with its own procedures. If there was compliance, the court based on precedents will dismiss the Application for judicial review.

Unlike in England, for example, generally the court in M’sia will not get into whether gov’t procedures were unfair. It will not consider the merits of the Application if the gov’t followed its own procedures. Hence, it has been alleged that the gov’t rarely loses judicial reviews.

Prerogative powers . . .

Having said that, no court will interfere in the prerogative and discretionary powers of gov’t and management unless abuse can be proven.

The hawker can argue that she has prerogative and discretionary powers on whether to impose masking and double dose vaccination on her patrons. The eatery belongs to her, not the gov’t.

The business is her property under Article 5 and 13. Article 8 says no discrimination. She cites these Articles and Article 9 on “Prohibition of banishment and freedom of movement”.

It’s true that no one can force the hawker to accept vaccination. However, the issue of “duty of care” may arise, with or without the other issues. For example, a lifeguard on duty at the swimming pool has a “duty of care” towards swimmers. He has to prevent death by drowning.

A swimmer sitting by the pool has no “duty of care” towards other swimmers.

re “duty of care”, the issue does not arise if the hawker isn’t “vaccinated” and if patrons are “vaccinated” and “unvaccinated”.

The difference is that the “vaccinated”, if infected, may suffer categories 1 to 3.

“Unvaccinated” may suffer categories 4 and 5, if not 1 to 3.

1 no symptoms

2 mild symptoms

3 pneumonia (eg James Masing who has been “vaccinated”)

4 oxygen support

5 ventilator support

The letter of the law isn’t the sum total of the rule of law. In the rule of law, the basis of the Constitution, there’s greater emphasis on the spirit of the law, read together with the letter of the law.

The letter of the law by itself isn’t law at all. There’s no democracy. It’s dictatorship i.e. rule by law or rule by Man viz. the law of the jungle. In a rule by law situation, there’s no legitimacy, no consent of the governed. The people would have lost their sovereignty.

NOTE: Longtime Borneo watcher Joe Fernandez keeps a keen eye on M’sia as a legal scholar (jurist).

He was formerly Chief Editor of Sabah Times. He’s not to be mistaken for a namesake previously with Daily Express.

Read further here . . .

A brother in law and family, all vaccinated, have been placed under self-isolation for 10 days after testing positive.

The daughter has been placed in quarantine for 14 days.

Earlier, a sister-in-law and husband were placed in quarantine for 14 days after testing positive. They were released after four days after I kicked up a fuss. They are double vaccinated.

Before being vaccinated, they were placed in quarantine for 14 days after testing positive. Sister in law was in category 4 i.e. oxygen support needed. She was on oxygen for four days.

Her husband was category 2 i.e. mild symptoms.

Medical professionals declare their stand.

Ranau directive is “inferior law”, null and void to the extent of its inconsistency with “superior law”, i.e. the National Recovery Plan.

How does the gov’t decide that virus cases are dipping or on the rise?

It’s BS!

‼️MASSIVE DUMP‼️ – Doctors who explain clearly why vaccines aren’t safe or effective.


  1. Dr. Nancy Banks –
  2. Dr. Russell Blaylock –
  3. Dr. Shiv Chopra –
  4. Dr. Sherri Tenpenny –
  5. Dr. Suzanne Humphries –
  6. Dr. Larry Palevsky –
  7. Dr. Toni Bark –
  8. Dr. Andrew Wakefield –
  9. Dr. Meryl Nass –
  10. Dr. Raymond Obomsawin –
  11. Dr. Ghislaine Lanctot –
  12. Dr. Robert Rowen –
  13. Dr. David Ayoub –
  14. Dr. Boyd Haley PhD –
  15. Dr. Rashid Buttar –
  16. Dr. Roby Mitchell –
  17. Dr. Ken Stoller –
  18. Dr. Mayer Eisenstein –
  19. Dr. Frank Engley, PhD –
  20. Dr. David Davis –
  21. Dr Tetyana Obukhanych –
  22. Dr. Harold E Buttram –
  23. Dr. Kelly Brogan –
  24. Dr. RC Tent –
  25. Dr. Rebecca Carley –
  26. Dr. Andrew Moulden –
  27. Dr. Jack Wolfson –
  28. Dr. Michael Elice –
  29. Dr. Terry Wahls –
  30. Dr. Stephanie Seneff –
  31. Dr. Paul Thomas –
  32. Many doctors talking at once –
  33. Dr. Richard Moskowitz – censored
  34. Dr. Jane Orient –
  35. Dr. Richard Deth –
  36. Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic –
  37. Dr Chris Shaw –
  38. Dr. Susan McCreadie –
  39. Dr. Mary Ann Block –
  40. Dr. David Brownstein –
  41. Dr. Jayne Donegan –
  42. Dr. Troy Ross – censored
  43. Dr. Philip Incao –
  44. Dr. Joseph Mercola –
  45. Dr. Jeff Bradstreet –
  46. Dr. Robert Mendelson –
  47. Dr Theresa Deisher
  48. Dr. Sam Eggertsen-

Hundreds more doctors testifying that vaccines aren’t safe or effective, in these documentaries….

  1. Vaccination – The Silent Epidemic –
  2. The Greater Good –
  3. Shots In The Dark –
  4. Vaccination The Hidden Truth –
  5. Vaccine Nation –
  6. Vaccination – The Truth About Vaccines –
  7. Lethal Injection –
  8. Bought –
  9. Deadly Immunity –
  10. Autism – Made in the USA –
  11. Beyond Treason –
  12. Trace Amounts –
  13. Why We Don’t Vaccinate –

9 hour court case


  1. Vaccination – The Silent Epidemic(2013)
  1. The Greater Good – (2011)

  1. Shots In The Dark -(2009)

  1. Vaccination The Hidden Truth -(1998)

  1. Vaccine Nation – (2008)

  1. Vaccination – The Truth About Vaccines –

  1. Lethal Injection –
  2. Bought – (2015)

  1. Deadly Immunity – (2005)

  1. Autism – Made in the USA(2009)
  1. Beyond Treason – (2005)

  1. Trace Amounts – (2014)

  1. Why We Don’t Vaccinate –

  1. Autism Yesterday – (2010) 🧅

Author: fernzthegreat

Joe Fernandez holds a honours degree in management, majoring in economics, and has opted from academia in law to being a jurist. He was trained professionally on the job as a journalist. He's a longtime Borneo watcher, keen on the history and legal aspects of Malaya's presence in Sabah and Sarawak. He teaches the English language privately and has emerged as a subject matter expert in public examination techniques.

One thought on “BREAKING NEWS . . . Sabah hawker queries ‘novel gene therapy’ disguised as ‘vaccine’ . . .”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: