Mask wearing not mandatory in law

COMMENT / America has decided: Mr President, you’re fired! . . .

In law, masking cannot be mandatory.

The gov’t will not be able to prove in court, based on subject matter expert opinion, that masking is the be all and end all of CV-19.

This is not communist China where the law of the jungle prevails.

No supermarket can tell you, in law, that you must wear a mask.

However, it can put up a notice that ten people wearing masks can enter at any one time for 15 minutes. This comes within prerogative and discretionary powers.

Biden cannot make mask wearing mandatory in the US. He can only politicise it.

US is not communist China.

However, the seat belt law is valid.

The gov’t can prove in court, based on statistics, that the practice reduces fatalities on the road.


Biden has threatened legal action.

Let the US Supreme Court, SCOTUS, decide.

Between Biden and Trump, the law and the Constitution favours the latter.

The AG is leaning towards Trump.

US Supreme Court, SCOTUS, will lean towards him.

Biden is the “accused”. So far, his defence has been a series of bare denials. He did not address the specific charges by Trump.

Biden cannot say baseless. Only the court can decide.

China, Russia, Mexico and Brazil, among others, have so far not congratulated Biden. They have adopted a “wait and see” approach.

It’s said that no matter what is thrown at Trump, he will prevail in US 2020 and return to the White House on Jan 20. Let’s see what happens.

Five or six companies control Big Media.

Big Media and Big Tech must be broken up.

Already, in the wake of Nov 3, the ratings for several media have collapsed after Trump voters boycotted them. That will set the stage for US 2024 which will probably further prove that the Democrats rigged US 2020.

Seventy one million people voted for Trump in 2020, six million more than in 2016. How did Biden get 74 million? Apparently, even dead people voted for him.

There’s also evidence emerging that Democrats used tampered software in counting machines to cheat

No matter what happens in US 2020, it will decide the fate of Big Media, who are in cahoots with Big Tech, Big Pharma and the DEEP STATE, in trying to call the 2020 elections.

This is unlawful.

When election results are 50:50, all sorts of problems can arise if the challenger does not concede.

Biden should have conceded since he failed to unseat Trump.

Instead, he’s busy trying to steal the election by further rigging i.e. adding segregated ballots to his numbers.

In law, the court will not allow the floodgates to open.

A line must be drawn somewhere.

Early ballots cannot be late. Early means EARLY. These ballots must be counted before Nov 3.

They can only be counted if they arrive before Nov 3, to be counted before Nov 3. Otherwise, there’s real risk of fraudulent practices.

Some states don’t allow early ballots to be counted before Nov 3.

What’s the INTENTION of the legislature in enacting the law? The court can declare the law. It was probably designed to prevent fraud. If so, early ballots cannot be counted after Nov 3.

Author: fernzthegreat

Joe Fernandez holds a honours degree in management, majoring in economics, and has opted from academia in law to being a jurist. He was trained professionally on the job as a journalist. He's a longtime Borneo watcher, keen on the history and legal aspects of Malaya's presence in Sabah and Sarawak. He teaches the English language privately and has emerged as a subject matter expert in public examination techniques.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: