BREAKING NEWS! . . . If ‘free flow of thoughts’ in media, Najib will redeem himself, return as PM . . .

Malaysiakini, to this day, hasn’t kicked me out.

Malaysiakini was probably worried that Malay would burn down its building.

https://www.thevibes.com/articles/news/52540/court-orders-lokman-adam-to-delete-social-media-postings-on-chief-judge-within-24-hours

The inter-parte Application should be heard as soon as possible.

Lokman Adam can refuse to delete the postings and risk being cited for contempt of court.

Once, I cited the other side for contempt of court.

The litigant claimed in FB that I had apologised to him although the case against me was only in the 3rd Day and the Trial proper hadn’t begun. The judge was still pushing for an out of court settlement. I had covered many of his cases for Malaysiakini.

To this day, the litigant hasn’t deleted the said posting in FB.

The litigant, a lawyer who filed a RM75m case against me, Steven Gan and a Sohan Singh, withdrew after the judge asked for submissions on contempt of court. Singh, allegedly, wasn’t paid by the litigant for 15 years. It was a matter of public concern and public interest.

PKR Sabah Chief Christina Liew introduced me to Singh who was her Client. She was reluctant to go to court against the litigant.

The litigant believed that the King of Frogs Jeffrey Kitingan had instigated Singh.

Liberty to file afresh . . .

Judge David Wong struck out the case with liberty to file afresh as offered by our lawyer.

I told off the lawyer for not first obtaining my consent on liberty to file afresh. He was really stupid. Later, I learnt that he was a friend of the litigant.

Steven Gan was mad over the contempt Application.

He had already agreed with the litigant on a suitable apology. He had allegedly agreed to kick me out as well from malaysiakini as reportedly demanded by the litigant.

Based on what the litigant was telling everybody, Gan was allegedly willing to cringe, crawl and grovel to settle the case out of court.

Malaysiakini, to this day, hasn’t kicked me out.

Gan said that he won’t upload my stories until I pay half the lawyer’s fees and get a good discount on his half of the Bill which was addressed to malaysiakini.

Malaysiakini was not sued but agreed to engage the lawyer.

The Malaysiakini BOD gave a Resolution to the High Court on the case. They confirmed that I was not the Author of a story cited in court by the litigant although it was under my byline.

Upload on RCI . . .

Malaysiakini did upload my stories on the RCI in Sabah sometime after the case.

Much later, in a rethink, Gan claimed that the Editors were unhappy about uploading my stories on the grounds that I had been badmouthing the website.

He provided no proof but promised to discuss with the so-called Editors and get back to me.

He never came back.

Malaysiakini stopped my complimentary premium subscription account in Sept 2020.

They banned my paid subscription account before it expired in Sept 2021. They were unhappy over my comment on a “ventilation of ignorance” Article by Bombastic Terence Netto on Malay citizenship, an idea re-floated by Gua Musang MP Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah.

Malaysiakini removed the second half of my Comment and left it hanging in the air.

Malaysiakini was probably worried that Malay, after having once splashed red paint on its premises, would burn down its building.

Free flow of thoughts . . .

When I was with Malaysiakini, they used to allow a free flow of thoughts. Since then, they have become worse than communists, Singapore, CCP, CNN and the Hindu evil caste system which prohibits upward social mobility based on superstitious notions of Karma.

What others do to us is their Karma. How we react is our Karma.

If there’s free flow of thoughts in the media, Najib will redeem himself, return as PM.

Trial by Media denied Najib justice.

Malay don’t exist as a people. Read the Definition of Malay in Article 160(2) of the Federal Constitution.

Malaysia isn’t tanah Melayu. Read my Blog piece on the subject. If I disclose the hits continuing to be generated, a year after the Blog piece was uploaded, all the media in Malaysia would commit hara-kiri.

No one in the world can rebut my Blog piece.

It’s based on eternal Truth.

The eternal Truth is the basis of eternal laws.

The eternal laws based on eternal Truth are also known as Word of God.

No flaws . . .

All the laws of science are Word of God and are about perfection. There are no flaws in the Word of God.

Word of God and God are synonymous. There’s no God separate from Word of God.

God, if separate from Word of God, has no work. Mathematics and Physics, being based on discoveries, are the nearest to Word of God.

BREAKING NEWS! . . . No surprise if Najib returns as PM . . .

No surprise if Najib returns as PM . . .

It will be poetic justice before or after GE15.

https://www.wionews.com/world/indian-origin-rishi-sunak-tipped-to-replace-johnson-as-pm-report-445193

Principles are important. Man does not live by bread alone.

The BoozeGate or PartyGate controversy will not end until there’s closure.

An apology will not be sufficient.

There’s no way that Turkish-origin Boris Johnson can SpinGate out of BoozeGate or PartyGate. If Boris Johnson continues, he will be mortally wounded.

Boris Johnson has lost any credibility he had.

Rishi Sunak, as British PM, will plug the UK into the Indian economy and the Commonwealth and away from Europe and America.

The West, with an eye on history, will not fail to seize on a ‘freak situation’ and take the road less travelled.

That’s how Obama became US President, Trump US President, and Kamala Harris US Vice President.

Trump said that he would not have become US President if not for Obama. The US went from one extreme to another, diplomacy to strongman.

Trump will probably become US President again in US 2024, this time because of Kamala Harris.

Americans are not ready to elect a female President. They think the Presidency is a man’s job especially in a nation like the US.

If so, it may be the first time in US history that a “defeated” US President returns and becomes President again. Trump might even become President in US 2028.

No one has become US President for three terms.

A Trump presidency for another eight years will change US and world history forever.

Trump ended the UK and US Special Relationship.

He put in place a global security framework which confined NATO, Germany and France to Europe and elevated India, China, Russia and Japan.

Australia, Singapore (replacing Malaysia) and Vietnam were given minor roles in the Indo-Pacific Theatre but confined to the Straits of Malacca and the South China Sea.

Indonesia deferred to India in the Straits of Malacca and the South China Sea.

History is about leadership.

Before Trump returns, Kamala Harris might finish Biden’s term as US President. That would be another “freak” situation created by Biden quitting office half-way, probably after the US midterms in 2022.

Biden has slipped many times in public on national TV and referred to Vice President Kamala Harris as President. He never corrected himself.

The media glossed over the incidents.

Kamala Harris will make history as US President by default.

In Malaysia, Wan Azizah could have been Selangor MB before GE14 and PM twice, after GE14, i.e on Thurs 10 May 2018 and Mon 24 Feb 2020.

The Selangor sultan had no sense of history before GE14.

The Agong recognised Wan Azizah on Thurs 10 May 2018 and again on Mon 24 Feb 2020.

Mahathir and DAP did not have a sense of history in 2018.

Mahathir, Anwar Ibrahim and DAP did not have a sense of history in 2020.

Anwar Ibrahim had a “dog in the manger” approach in 2020. It’s difficult to see him as PM before or after GE15.

After Wan Azizah it will take another 50 years for a woman to be MB, CM or PM.

It’s more likely that Najib Abdul Razak will return as PM before or after GE15.

It will be poetic justice before or after GE15.

There wasn’t any proof in the media or in court that funds were misappropriated from 1MDB.

Misappropriation of funds were allegedly fairy tales created by the media, an unthinking animal, manipulated by the Opposition.

For example, the High Court of Malaya recently directed that RM100m seized from Umno be returned to the party after the AGC could not prove the money was from 1MDB.

There are many government agencies and companies holding government guarantees.

The government, under guarantees, is responsible for the liabilities of 1MDB.

If 1MDB’s IPO had gone through, the government does not have to pay 1MDB loans. The Opposition, in cahoots with the media, allegedly sabotaged the IPO exercise.

1MDB wasn’t mentioned in the various out of court settlements in jurisdictions overseas. The settlements were without prejudice.

1MDB can only be mentioned if there were criminal cases related to the Company.

There were none.

There were no civil action cases on money laundering related to 1MDB. If there were such cases, 1MDB could not be mentioned.

Read here . . .

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10159658315898620&id=522048619

[19/01, 19:58] +60 12-280 8302:

๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘

Was and is Najib sorry when he was caught and now convicted?

No not a trace of guilt and worst still, corrupting the future generations with his Malu Apa bosskuโ€ฆ.

( AND those that are cooking up stories to defend him are either stupid or worse then the robber Najib)

[19/01, 19:58] +60 12-280 8302:

In law, those who accuse must prove it.

Getting personal and highly offensive isn’t the way forward.

BREAKING NEWS! . . . Sabah, Sarawak, limited Immigration powers delegated by Prime Minister, Home Minister . . .

Sabah, Sarawak, limited Immigration powers delegated by Prime Minister, Home Minister.

Federal government has sole Immigration power under Federal Constitution, MA’63.

https://www.malaymail.com/news/malaysia/2022/01/15/minister-free-entry-to-sabah-via-labuan-to-end-soon/2035257

COMMENTARY and ANALYSIS . . .

The headline in the above link may be an error in facts and law, somewhat misplaced, if not clickbait.

In fact, the truth may be stranger than fiction. The Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA’63) isn’t law, but as the ultimate political document on Malaysia, it has force of law just like the Federal Constitution.

MA’63, or no MA’63, the British simply transferred the Administration of the Borneo Territories, North Borneo and Sarawak, to the Malayan government on 16 Sept 1963, Malaysia Day.

There are many exceptions, caveats, ifs and buts on Immigration, as evident in the Article itself. It’s not black and white only, black only, or white only. There are many shades of grey.

Obviously, the reference to State government in Borneo is a misnomer. It’s Territorial Government in Sabah and Sarawak.

The recent Amendments to the Federal Constitution, in restoring the status before 13 July 1976 on Article 1(2), re-enshrines Sabah and Sarawak as Borneo Territories in Malaysia. They are not states as in the Federation i.e. Malaya under the Federation of Malaya Agreement 1948. The 1948 Agreement was reinforced by the Federation of Malaya Independence Act 1957.

Unincorporated . . .

Borneo States in this case, Article 1(2), reads in law as Territories i.e. they are organised politically but remain unincorporated. They are not in the Federation. The Definition of Federation, notwithstanding the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA’63) in Article 160(2), refers.

The reference to the Borneo States in MA’63 Article 1 being Federated with the “states in the Federation of Malaya” does not mean, in law, a new and enlarged Federation emerged.

The Article in the link above itself states, among others, “if the State Government claims its full rights and authority under the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63)”.

This is a BIG IF.

The BIG IF itself may be a contradiction in terms as it implies that Malaysia, although one country, has two Immigration systems as that which covers Hong Kong post-1997 and China. That year saw the British Administration withdraw its presence from the Island and the New Territories on the mainland. The year 1997 brought an end, in law, to Hong Kong’s British Crown Colony status and its “return” to China although Britain had the New Territories in “perpetuity”.

Important differences . . .

There are important differences between post-1997 and Malaysia Day on 16 Sept 1963.

Chinese nationals, although they can enter Hong Kong, cannot stay indefinately even though, on paper, they may be permitted. The reality decides that Hong Kong cannot allow Chinese nationals to overwhelm Hong Kong people by their sheer numbers. So, reality dictates that the number of Chinese nationals in Hong Kong, for whatever reason, don’t compromise the sovereignty of the people in any manner.

Unlike China, Hong Kong subscribes to the rule of law. The Basic Law is the Constitution of Hong Kong.

In Malaysia, likewise, the rule of law is the basis of the Constitution, i.e. both the Federal Constitution and the unwritten/uncodified “Malaysia Constitution” arising from the constitutional documents on 16 Sept 1963.

In Malaysia, citizens are free to reside anywhere in the country including in Sabah and Sarawak where, although permission may be required, there may in fact be no reason in law to deny it especially when illegal immigrants have over run them.

Immigration checkpoint . . .

There are reasons in law why Labuan-Sabah has not been gazetted as an Immigration checkpoint. It probably cannot be done. I stand corrected on this matter which comes within the purview of Parliament. Immigration checkpoints can only be gazetted with Parliamentary oversight.

It cannot be said that the people of Labuan, although staying in a Federal Territory, are not Sabahan.

In law, there cannot be any Immigration checkpoints within Sabah. Labuan to Sabah remain in law Sabah to Sabah and vice versa.

The Sabah Immigration Director was quoted in the local media, many years ago, as saying that non-Labuanites entering Sabah can keep their ferry tickets and boarding pass as “proof of valid entry”. He added that the documents are valid for three months as with the visit pass slips and that stamped on passports at gazetted Immigration checkpoints.

The Sabah Immigration Director clarified matters in the local media after Malaysian citizens, originating from Malaya, could not produce proof of valid entry from Labuan when exiting Sabah via a gazetted Immigration checkpoint. Apparently, being Malaysian, they threw away their ferry ticket and boarding pass.

Foreigners in the same predicament would be fined RM800.

Special circumstances . . .

The pandemic has created “special circumstances”, under the Immigration Act in Malaysia, as evident from media reports on the phenomenon.

It should be noted that Sabah and Sarawak have no Immigration powers in law except for that which cannot be exercised by the Federal gov’t in the Borneo Territories.

Immigration is a Federal power.

No state/Territory in Malaysia has Immigration powers.

The Prime Minister has delegated certain Immigration powers by Administration to the Chief Minister in Sabah and Sarawak, and the Home Minister has exercised the same Option with the Territorial Secretary in the two Borneo States.

Briefly, these powers cover visit pass, student visa, dependency pass, longterm spouse visa, work permit and permanent residence in Sabah and Sarawak.

Permanent residence in Sabah and Sarawak is a separate matter from Malaysian permanent residence i.e. red MyKad.

Sarawakians have en bloc permanent residence in Sabah by law but not vice versa. It’s not known whether the latter is work in progress.

There are probably not that many Sabahan in Sarawak which lies somewhat in the backwaters and has a reputation for being parochial. Kota Kinabalu, the Sabah capital, is an international city. It’s also an international airhub, the second busiest in Malaysia after KLIA in Sepang.

National Census . . .

The 2010 National Census reported 3.2m people in Sabah as follows: 1.5m Malaysian; 700K non-Malaysian with work permits; 600K with “documents”; and 400K “undocumented” people.

The 2020 National Census, delayed by the pandemic, has not reported the figures.

In Sabah, the media reported 150K Sarawakian in the Territory. That was many years ago.

BREAKING NEWS! . . . MA’63 isn’t law, Federal Court declared . . .

Opinion on Borneo rights being viralled from forever . . .

People’s Petition on MA’63 may be Way Forward on Malaysia!

MAโ€™63 isnโ€™t law, Federal Court declared . . .

It can be argued that MA’63, the ultimate political document on M’sia, has force of law.

COMMENT and ANALYSIS . . . If I don’t mention source in this comment and analysis, I am connecting the dots as a legal scholar (jurist). There’s originality of thought even if inspired by source.

The graphics above on the “validity” of the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA’63) has been viralled in Sabah and Sarawak since forever.

MA’63 is the basis for the Borneo Territories, Sabah and Sarawak, being in Malaysia with Malaya, ostensibly as “Equal Partners”.

Malaysia isn’t Federation, it can be argued, but again “Equal Partnership”.

The Federation was under the Federation of Malaya Agreement 1948 (it’s not 1957). See Definition of Federation in Article 160(2) of the Federal Constitution. The Federation of Malaya Independence Act 1957 reinforced the 1948 Agreement. Both should be mentioned in Article 160(2). Instead, the Article in the Federal Constitution dates the Agreement as 1957. This is an error in fact and error in law which can only be blamed on the printer’s devil.

Equal Partnership in this case cannot be about population and territory but only about law. That’s why there are two High Court in Malaysia viz. High Court of Borneo (Sabah and Sarawak) and High Court of Malaya (yes Malaya, not Malaysia).

Malaya exists as seen in the High Court of Malaya, Universiti Malaya, and various statutes and case laws. Malaya cannot be read, in law, as synonymous with Malaysia. This is a fact in law. If it’s Opinion, it will stand up in the court of law.

The Opinion in the graphics isn’t law. Only the court can declare law.

Even an “invalid” law or Agreement “like MA’63” is valid in law unless the court declares otherwise. If MA’63 is invalid in law, the High Court of Borneo and the Federal Court wouldn’t refer to it from time to time before Ruling on matters which originate from the Borneo Territories.

Again, in the case of the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA’63), the passage of time may matter in law.

There have been so many elections and gov’ts in Sabah and Sarawak since Malaysia Day, 16 Sept 1963.

If MA’63 is invalid in law, the matter should have been taken up by the parties concerned within a reasonable period of time from Malaysia Day.

It was not done.

That may be a fatal flaw in law. I stand corrected as, except for 1990 to 1994 in Sabah under Joseph Pairin Kitingan, the gov’ts in Sabah and Sarawak have been proxy gov’ts of the Federal gov’t. The gov’t in Sarawak hasn’t changed since 1966. Under international law, the people of Sarawak have lost their sovereignty.

Locus standi . . .

The people, under the international law on self-determination and human rights, have locus standi.

They should have lodged a Petition with the UN Security General, UN Security Council, UN General Assembly, the International Court of Justice, the International Criminal Court since the Federal gov’t was allegedly party to illegalities in the Borneo Territories, the Federal Court, Agong, the High Court in London and the Queen in England. Before the UK left EU, the Petition could have been lodged at the European Court as well.

The people can still do it.

Belum cuba, belum tahu (if you don’t try, you won’t know).

In short, the People’s Petition on MA’63 may be the Way Forward on Malaysia.

Sabah and Sarawak also have other Options on MA’63 and Borneo rights.

These include seeking greater administrative powers by devolution for Sabah and Sarawak, autonomy, self-determination, independence, secession, and unilateral declaration of independence, among others.

Court of law . . .

The court of law is only about law, not truth.

The court isn’t about ethics, moral, theology, sin, God or justice.

Law exists, and has always existed as evident from the Word of God, based on common sense, universal values and the principles of natural justice.

Common sense may not be common but it exists.

Streets . . .

The Federal Court has previously declared that only what has been incorporated from MA’63, in the Federal Constitution, is law.

No court will compel compliance on a contract. At best it can only offer compensation. It must be quantified at the assistant registrarโ€™s office.

MAโ€™63 is an international Treaty or Agreement.

Political matters must be settled politically, not in a court of law.

In law, a gov’t on paper can do whatever it wants unless restrained by the court or by the people taking to the streets.

Administrative law — gov’t policy in action which has been gazetted — is about gov’t doing whatever it wants.

The streets II . . .

Kazakhstan is an example of the people taking to the streets. It’s a People’s Movement on multiple issues.

The farmers in India, on the streets for months, is an example of the people taking to the streets. It was about a specific issue: three Agriculture Bills ostensibly designed to modernise agriculture. No surrender no compromise Modi recently agreed to withdraw the Bills.

Wed 6 Jan 2021 in the US was an example of the people taking to the streets. It was about a specific issue: electoral integrity.

In the rule of law, the basis of the Constitution, there’s greater emphasis on the spirit of the law, read with the letter of the law.

The letter of the law, by itself, isn’t law at all.

There must be a basis for comparison.

We can’t compare apples and oranges.

If we understand Definition, and thesis statement, we would be better placed to connect the dots for the Way Forward on relevant facts, the issues arising, and the law/s applicable.

The following on operation of law is an extract from wikipedia and may have relevance in court . . .

Operation of law is a way in which someone gets certain rights (or sometimes responsibilities) automatically under the law without taking action, requiring cooperation from another person, or being the subject of a court order.

Operation of law can also describe what a person can or cannot do, or what rights or interests a person has.

Therein lies the case for letters of representation to the AGC and AG on matters in court.

Read the Article in Full here . . .

BREAKING NEWS! . . . Dec 18 Sarawak election undemocratic, not perfected in law . . .

Dec 18 Sarawak election undemocratic, not perfected in law . . .

Winners must get at least 51 per cent of votes counted for legitimacy.

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10159652357458620&id=522048619

It isn’t true that Washington is behind the current unrest in Kazakhstan.

We have seen the same protests in India, for example. Farmers took to the streets for months in protest against three Agriculture Bills. No surrender no compromise Modi was forced to withdraw the three Bills which were ostensibly designed to modernise Agriculture.

Big business, including foreign, would have pushed out the small independent farmer under the three Bills.

It was an attack on democracy.

On Jan 6 last year in Washington, more than a million people descended on Capitol Hill as a People’s Movement for electoral integrity.

Under the guise of the pandemic, special circumstances, there was no electoral integrity in US 2020.

In law, a line must be drawn somewhere, lest Pandora’s Box opens.

No court will allow the floodgates to open.

The Supreme Court of the US did not hear Applications and Petitions on electoral integrity, the basis of the US Constitution.

The US Supreme Court left it to the states — legislature and election officials — to conduct the US 2020 presidential elections. It said that every vote must be counted.

Trump obtained 76m votes, the highest ever by a sitting US President.

Biden obtained “mathematically impossible” 81m votes although he didn’t campaign and spoke mostly at virtually empty parking lots of shopping malls and supermarkets.

The majority of the states, in the wake of US 2020, have enacted laws to ensure electoral integrity.

Biden plans a Federal Bill to ensure voting rights.The US Supreme Court has already Ruled that the states must conduct the US Presidential election.

The electoral college system, which picks the US President, is based in the states.

The popular votes don’t pick the US President.

Biden became President because he secured the electoral college in six swing states where there was allegedly no electoral integrity.

Integrity can be defined as doing no wrong even when no one was looking.

Democracy isn’t about voting once in four years and going home and sleeping.

Democracy only works if the people form Movements, between elections, on every issue and take to the streets if the gov’t closes the door to dialogue or the court denies hearing the People’s Petitions.

Having said that, it has been the policy of Washington, no matter who comes or goes, to support Opposition movements worldwide on human rights issues while doing business with the gov’t of the day.

Besides political parties, Opposition includes NGO and media, among others.

Human rights is the basis of international law.

International law arises from international customary practices.

Under international law, if gov’t cannot be changed by elections, the people have lost their sovereignty to a handful of control freaks in power.

It’s the obligation, responsibility and duty of the international community to restore sovereignty to a people who have lost it.

The gov’t in Sarawak, for example, hasn’t changed since 1966 when the Federal gov’t ousted Chief Minister Stephen Kalong Ningkan from power, twice within weeks. Ningkan was from SNAP.

No Iban has been Chief Minister of Sarawak after Tawi Sli from Pesaka briefly replaced Ningkan.

Pesaka is a component of PBB which leads the Gabungan Parti Sarawak (GPS) coalition.

The Dec 18 Sarawak election wasn’t perfected in law. There’s no legitimacy.

The Dec 18 election in Sarawak was the most undemocratic in the history of Malaysia.

GPS won less than half the 82 seats at stake with less than 51 per cent of the votes counted.

No election runoffs were held as elewhere in the world, between the top two contenders, in the seats where the winners obtained less than 51 per cent of the seats counted.

GPS is an undemocratic pre-election coalition which circumvents the democratic process, by endorsing elite power sharing through seat sharing, and denies the grassroots majority meaningful participation in elections.

Pre-election coalitions are not allowed in democratic countries.

Even the Chinese Communist Party elections are more democratic than the Sarawak election on Dec 18.

No one is allowed to win these elections with less than 51 per cent of the votes counted.

BREAKING NEWS! . . . Shebby Singh had booster dose two days before he died . . .

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=495684775224823&id=100043499141030

Shebby Singh had booster dose two days before he died . . .

The former ace footballer went while he was cycling.

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/hareshdeol_farewell-shebby-we-will-miss-you-dearly-activity-6887180237440974848-AAkD

(See UPDATE on Shebby Singh at the end of this Comment piece)

Haresh Deol,

I believe that Shebby went while he was cycling.

I was supposed to be on the tread mill for six minutes during a medical review. The doctor stopped me after three minutes. The blood pressure had raced to 210 over 126.

After stopping at three minutes, the blood pressure dropped within 15 seconds to 120/80. The doctor and nurse in attendance were surprised.

Sudden increases and sudden drops in blood pressure can have fatal consequences.

The tread mill may be a killer machine for those over 40 years.

Cycling, jogging, badminton and soccer have the same effects as the tread mills. Tread mills should come with a warning on usage. The gov’t looks the other way because tread mills are big business.

I have a walker. I stopped using it. It’s about keeping on the safe side.

After 40 years, except for walking from the house and back for 40 minutes three times a week, no other form of exercise may be safe.

In fact, it’s even safer if we walk for 10 minutes after every meal. That will help regulate the blood glucose level within a month and keep it under control.

Many people don’t know that strenous exercise increases the stress level and pumps even more glucose into the bloodstream. So, it’s not true that exercise helps diabetics to cope with uncontrolled blood glucose level.

Uncontrolled blood glucose level increases toxicity and hardens one side of the heart muscles to cause cardiac failure. The patient will drop dead suddenly. Cardiac problems are incurable disease.

All post-mortem are about toxicity.

Health supplements may also cause premature death. They increase toxicity levels.

Those who take health supplements should stop after two weeks. They can resume every four months but for only two weeks.

In fact, half a glass of milk will give us enough mineral salts for a year. However, mineral salts in excess don’t stay in the body. So, we have to drink that half glass milk at least three times a week, if not everyday.

Milk is a good source of protein which we need on a daily basis.

Milk also has lactose which is milk sugar. All tose are sugars.

We can get vitamins from fruits and vegetables. Follow a balanced diet.

If we are deficient in vitamins and mineral salts, there will be signs, and the doctor will prescribe remedies.

If possible, avoid artificial vitamins and mineral salts, as the risk of premature death brought by their unregulated use, increases with age, especially after 40.

The gov’t and even the FDA in the US looks the other way on health supplements.

Health supplements are big money for Big Pharma. They contribute billions in taxes and donate to politicians. Big Pharma funds media, an unthinking animal, through advertisements, advertorials and sponsorships.

Everyone remembers how Milo was caught in Malaysia for loading their drinks with sugar. There was very little cocoa in Milo.

Big Pharma has taken over the food industry to promote addiction to sugar.

Sugar, refined, causes all the diseases in the world. Big Pharma makes billions from these diseases by promoting fake solutions for fake problems.

Big Pharma funds R&D driven by scientific consensus i.e. pseudo science or fake science.

Science is based on scientific methods.

UPDATE . . . It seems that Shebby Singh had the booster dose two days before he died.

The gov’t will deny he died because of the vaccine.

They will claim that he died after not resting for at least three weeks from the 3rd dose. It’s known from media reports that vaccination, like exercise, affects the heart. The organ may be inflammed temporarily, or permanently, after the vaccine. It won’t be able to cope with exercise carried out within three weeks of a dose.

According to sources in the social media, Singh appeared very tired after the booster dose. That may indicate heart problems and insufficient oxygen intake probably caused by fibrosis i.e. hardening of the lung cells. If fibrosis reaches 50 per cent, the patient will drop dead.

In any case, as stated at the beginning of this Comment, most exercise can kill especially those aged 40 years and above.

Otherwise, Covid-19 symptoms brought by the novel Corona virus, kills when unsanitised hand touches the mouth, nose and eyes.

The mask protects the mouth and nose from unsanitised hands.

The virus can still enter the body through the eyes when unsanitised hands touch it. Wear face shield,  googles or glasses to protect the eyes.

Sanitise the hands once a day at home.

In public, sanitise the hands before touching anything that someone has touched.

Life is fragile. Don’t take things for granted. Don’t rest on the laurels.

Don’t be reckless. Keep on the safe side.

If over 40 years old, do a medical review every two years, and keep underlying health and medical conditions under treatment, management and control. The medical regime that prolongs life may also end it as there could be an increase in toxicity through prolonged use of medication. Herbals kill in a much shorter time i.e. within five to 15 years.

Before the pandemic, about 678 people used to die daily in Malaysia. About 60 per cent of these deaths, based on known trends worldwide, may be caused by medical errors, negligence, and malpractice. The figure could be higher in Malaysia since every Tom, Dick and Harry is entering the medical faculties of the 20 public universities.

Read here . . .

https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2022/01/15/shebbys-death-not-linked-to-booster-shot-says-son/

If three arteries were almost completely blocked, he should not be out cycling especially since he was over 40 years age, heart by-pass should have been done as early as possible.

https://www.techarp.com/internet/shebby-singh-booster-dose-2-days/

BREAKING NEWS! . . . Sarawak election on Dec 18 not perfected in law, no legitimacy . . .

Sarawak election on Dec 18 not perfected in law, no legitimacy . . .

If runoffs were held, GPS would not be able to form the gov’t.

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10159647653238620&id=522048619

All these by Nicholas Bawin in FB are not issues. In fact, they don’t matter.

What matters is whether the Cabinet system is based on the consensus principle i.e. no voice against before a decision is taken and minuted.

All matters which should be brought before the Cabinet cannot be decided outside the system.

Already, the people of Sarawak have lost their sovereignty to a small group of control freaks in power.

There has been no change of gov’t in Sarawak since 1966 when Stephen Kalong Ningkan was ousted twice by the Federal gov’t.

Under international law, when a gov’t can’t be changed by elections, the people have lost their sovereignty.

Under international law, it’s the obligation, responsibility and duty of the international community to restore sovereignty to a people who have lost it.

The Sarawak election on Dec 18 was not perfected in law.

There’s no legitimacy.

GPS obtained 51 per cent of the votes counted in less than half the seats.

There were no election runoffs in Sarawak after Dec 18, as in other democratic countries and even in communist China in party elections, in seats where no candidate obtained at least 51 per cent of the votes counted.

If runoffs were held within two weeks or a month at the latest, between the top two candidates in certain seats on Dec 18, GPS would not be able to form the gov’t.

A coalition of Opposition parties will seize power in Sarawak.

Read here . . .

https://fernzthegreat.wordpress.com/2021/12/29/breaking-news-dec-18-polls-further-confirms-sarawakian-have-lost-sovereignty/

https://fernzthegreat.wordpress.com/2021/12/19/breaking-news-losers-declared-winners-in-dec-18-sarawak-polls/

BREAKING NEWS! . . . Often, we don’t decide, the Truth — only One — and Karma will decide . . .

Often, we don’t decide, the Truth — only One — and Karma will decide . . .

Jesus explained Truth (emanicipation), Faith (seeing things which can exist) and Karma (cause and effect).

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10159644593598620&id=522048619

Judy Wong,

Word of God and God are synonymous. There’s no God separate from Word of God.

There’s no reason for Hindu in India, for example, to become Christian because of the Hindu evil caste system which prohibits upward social mobility for All and confines the Pariah (casteless/outcaste) to the most dirty, difficult, dangerous, demeaning, himiliating and polluting jobs like removing faeces with the bare hands, and working with leather and the dead.

The Indian Constitution outlawed the Hindu evil caste system in 1947.

In the rule of law, the basis of the Constitution, there’s greater emphasis on the spirit of the law, read with the letter of the law.

The letter of the law, by itself, isn’t law at all.

The Hindu evil caste system is an example of the letter of the law.

In law, there can be no discrimination.

Discrimination is a violation of international law.

Human rights, the basis of international law, is about international customary practices.

International law is based on international customary practices.

Christianity is about the Church remembering Jesus through readings from the Holy Bible, the Word of God.

Word of God is about the One Truth on which all eternal laws are based.

The One Truth, once it emerges, sets us free.

It cannot be hidden.

It has a lifeforce of its own and must come into fruition.

Jesus explained Truth, Faith and Karma.

All the laws of science are Word of God. These have a spiritual nature.

Man is Spirit.

Karma is the 1st eternal law based on eternal Truth.

The more that we fight Karma, the more that it will fight us.

The court of law is only about law, not truth.

The court of law isn’t about ethics, moral values, theology, sin, God or justice.

In the court of law, people swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

Often, the court has no way of determining the truth.

So, it cannot be about the truth. It can only be about law.

A case between the parties in dispute on issues in conflict can only be about relevant facts, the issues arising and the law/s applicable.

The court has to find the law and declare it based on the spirit of the law, read with the letter of the law.

Lawyers look for the law and point it out.

Again, the court of law is only about law, not truth.

Word of God . . . i.e. eternal laws . . . are based on the eternal truth. Truth is One.

Often, we don’t decide. The Truth, only One, and Karma will decide. Again, Jesus explained Truth, Faith and Karma.

Karmic forces exhaust themselves sooner or later. Time will exhaust the Karmic forces.

Karma is neutral.

It’s human perceptions that see Karma as good, bad, ugly, evil, beautiful, positive, negative, pessimistic, optimistic, constructive or destructive.

What others do to you is their Karma. How you react is your Karma.

Neutralise Karma through acceptance. The more that we fight Karma, the more that it will fight us.

Consider everything that happens as a blessing in disguise, count the blessings, be thankful and grateful so that we will have even more reasons to be thankful and grateful tomorrow, look for the silver lining in the clouds, opportunities often come disguised as problems.

The answers often lie right under our noses.

Keep the conscience clear.

It’s the guilty conscience that kills.

Those who block the clear energy will be moved out of the way.

Jesus had the healing touch arising from eternal laws based on eternal truth.

Sanatana (science) Dharma (duties) is about the civilisational values of ancient India. They are not eternal laws based on eternal truth.

Civilisational values change from time to time throughout the Ages. Example: the Hindu evil caste system which was outlawed by the Indian Constitution in 1947.

The Hindu evil caste system is about the letter of the law.

Many lawyers belabour in the delusion that the letter of the law, by itself, is the sum total of the rule of law.

BREAKING NEWS! . . . Control freaks manipulating media, an unthinking animal, for greater political power . . .

Control freaks manipulating media, an unthinking animal, for greater political power.

It’s totalitarianism based on the law of the jungle and making up stories as they go along on the pandemic.

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/mikitani_japans-current-border-restrictions-feel-activity-6886585812033642496-GVtM

Mickey Mikitani, Tony Fernandes,

Control freaks are manipulating the media, an unthinking animal, to play politics with the pandemic to accumulate even greater power by imposing a do and don’t list, and dictate halal and haram.

This is totalitarianism based on the law of the jungle and making up stories as they go along.

Only the unsanitised hands can infect by touching the mouth, nose and eyes.

The vaccine does not protect. It’s claimed the vaccine can moderate the over reaction of the immune system, petrified by the perceived aggressiveness of the novel Corona virus in the epithelial cells and lymph nodes. The immune system unleashes symptoms including inflammation, fibrosis, and fluid in the respiratory system in response to the presence of the virus.

Vaccinated people can get infected if they touch the mouth, nose and eyes with unsanitised hands.

The hand sanitiser pricks the skin of the virus, its fatty layer spills out and there’s no more form of intelligence.

The virus isn’t a living thing. So, nothing can “kill” a virus.

The virus is a form of intelligence which can only exist in the host body. The virus doesn’t kill the host body.

There are 380 trillion viruses, 60 trillion bacteria and some fungi in the human body.

There are treatments for fungi.

A course of antibiotics, if completed, can kill bad bacteria. Otherwise, the body builds up resistance to antibiotics.

Antibiotics kill both good and bad bacteria.

Then, there will be food poisoning followed by purging, diarrhoea and, if left unattended, dehydration, sepsis, septicemia, complications, multiple organ failure, systemic failure, coma, shock, heart failure and death.

Take prebiotics and probiotics after finishing a course of antibiotics. That will restore the intestinal flora balance.

Generally, it’s the good bacteria that kills the bad bacteria provided if the former is more than the latter.

Intestinal flora — i.e. good bacteria and bad bacteria — must be in balance for immune system health.

Take rasam and yoghurt at least two or three times a week for intestinal flora balance and immune system health.

The immune system begins in the guts.

All diseases also begin in the guts.

Fast once a week from dawn to dusk. SIP only warm water while seated.

Stay hungry for 30 mins to 90 mins before the first meal of the day. That will help convert body fat into energy. It will keep the pancreas and liver fat free.

Walk for 10 minutes after every meal. If sleepy after a meal, your blood glucose level has spiked.

Uncontrolled blood glucose level will increase toxicity and harden heart muscles on one side of the organ. There’s risk of heart failure i.e. dropping dead suddenly.

Heart attack and cardiac failure are separate issues.

Cardiac failure is an incurable disease.

Heart attacks are caused by blockages. They can be removed. Blockages are not heart disease. They are a lifestyle problem.

SIP eight glasses of warm water daily while seated.

Get eight hours of NIGHT sleep.

BREAKING NEWS! . . . Opinion on Borneo rights being viralled from forever . . .

BREAKING NEWS! . . . Opinion on Borneo rights being viralled from forever . . .

People’s Petition on MA’63 may be Way Forward on Malaysia!

COMMENT and ANALYSIS . . . If I don’t mention source in this comment and analysis, I am connecting the dots as a legal scholar (jurist). There’s originality of thought even if inspired by source.

The graphics above on the “validity” of the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA’63) has been viralled in Sabah and Sarawak since forever.

MA’63 is the basis for the Borneo Territories, Sabah and Sarawak, being in Malaysia with Malaya, ostensibly as “Equal Partners”.

Malaysia isn’t Federation, it can be argued, but again “Equal Partnership”.

The Federation was under the Federation of Malaya Agreement 1948 (it’s not 1957). See Definition of Federation in Article 160(2) of the Federal Constitution. The Federation of Malaya Independence Act 1957 reinforced the 1948 Agreement. Both should be mentioned in Article 160(2). Instead, the Article in the Federal Constitution dates the Agreement as 1957. This is an error in fact and error in law which can only be blamed on the printer’s devil.

Equal Partnership in this case cannot be about population and territory but only about law. That’s why there are two High Court in Malaysia viz. High Court of Borneo (Sabah and Sarawak) and High Court of Malaya (yes Malaya, not Malaysia).

Malaya exists as seen in the High Court of Malaya, Universiti Malaya, and various statutes and case laws. Malaya cannot be read, in law, as synonymous with Malaysia. This is a fact in law. If it’s Opinion, it will stand up in the court of law.

The Opinion in the graphics isn’t law. Only the court can declare law.

Even an “invalid” law or Agreement “like MA’63” is valid in law unless the court declares otherwise. If MA’63 is invalid in law, the High Court of Borneo and the Federal Court wouldn’t refer to it from time to time before Ruling on matters which originate from the Borneo Territories.

Again, in the case of the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA’63), the passage of time may matter in law.

There have been so many elections and gov’ts in Sabah and Sarawak since Malaysia Day, 16 Sept 1963.

If MA’63 is invalid in law, the matter should have been taken up by the parties concerned within a reasonable period of time from Malaysia Day.

It was not done.

That may be a fatal flaw in law. I stand corrected as, except for 1990 to 1994 in Sabah under Joseph Pairin Kitingan, the gov’ts in Sabah and Sarawak have been proxy gov’ts of the Federal gov’t. The gov’t in Sarawak hasn’t changed since 1966. Under international law, the people of Sarawak have lost their sovereignty.

Still, as the University of London cautions law students, “it’s not possible for anyone to know law”.

“Law, ultimately, remains the power of language.”

Indeed, law students aren’t even marked for law, but for the English language, evidence of wide reading, and “the ability to think like a lawyer”.

There are no right or wrong answers in law exams.

Locus standi . . .

The people, under the international law on self-determination and human rights, have locus standi.

They should have lodged a Petition with the UN Security General, UN Security Council, UN General Assembly, the International Court of Justice, the International Criminal Court since the Federal gov’t was allegedly party to illegalities in the Borneo Territories, the Federal Court, Agong, the High Court in London and the Queen in England. Before the UK left EU, the Petition could have been lodged at the European Court as well.

The people can still do it.

Belum cuba, belum tahu (if you don’t try, you won’t know).

In short, the People’s Petition on MA’63 may be the Way Forward on Malaysia.

Sabah and Sarawak also have other Options on MA’63 and Borneo rights.

These include seeking greater administrative powers by devolution for Sabah and Sarawak, autonomy, self-determination, independence, secession, and unilateral declaration of independence, among others.

Origin of law . . .

At the risk of being labelled superstitious and delusional, it can be argued that science implies, if it has not acknowledged, that the Word of God is the origin of law.

All knowledge exists and known either by revelations (given) or discoveries (found through calculations).

Word of God also inspired the rule of law.

Patently, all laws of science are Word of God. These laws are not inventions but discoveries of the Word of God i.e. they are perfect.

In human society, there’s creativity, inventiveness and innovation — new ways of doing old things — brought by technology. Innovation, by far, adds the greatest number to GDP growth. This explains why the US economy remains far ahead of others. Only India, according to former Harvard University Economics Professor Dr Subramaniam Swamy, can pace the US on innovations. “Innovations will propel India to the number one spot, ahead of China and the US,” he has claimed in many videos in YouTube.

He has “unconventional views” on law, politics and economics. Deja Vu!

Spiritual nature . . .

Word of God refers to eternal laws based on eternal truth. These have a spiritual nature.

Man is spirit. The mind, consciousness and spirit are all one and the same. The mind, according to spiritualist, mystic and yogi SadhGuru, isn’t only in the brain but permeates the whole body.

Word of God and God are synonymous. There can be no God separate from Word of God. God, by itself, has no work. Mathematics and physics are the nearest to the Word of God.

In jurisprudence, God isn’t a source in law. Jurisprudence does not mention Word of God.

Islam, based on the concept of sin, begs to differ on jurisprudence.

Islam may not be about the Word of God i.e. eternal laws based on eternal truth. Given the punitive “disproportionality” in Islam based on the concept of sin, the religion isn’t about discoveries. It claims it’s about revelations. Discoveries and revelations are about the same eternal laws based on eternal truth.

Except for self-taught mathematician Srinivasa Ramanujan who attributed his work to revelations, all the laws of science so far have been discoveries.

Having said that, there’s Debate raging on whether mathematics was based on discoveries or whether they are inventions. If inventions, Ramanujan was in no position to invent mathematics. He didn’t even have proper formal schooling. Some mathematicians alleged that Ramanajun had a great capacity for memorisation and that he didn’t really stand for anything new. Although some of Ramanujan’s mathematics was already known to others, he shed new light on them after coming by the known mathematics by himself, and also revealed much which was entirely new.

Ancient India . . .

Sanatana (science) Dharma (duties) from ancient Indian civilisation, not to be confused with Hinduism which is about local practices allegedly
based on delusions which vary from place to place, claims it’s about eternal laws based on eternal truth. However, Sanatana Dharma says its about civilisational values. Civilisational values are not about eternal laws based on eternal truth. The civilisational values change from time to time, through the ages, as ethics and moral values evolve.

Court of law . . .

The court of law is only about law, not truth.

The court isn’t about ethics, moral, theology, sin, God or justice.

Law exists, and has always existed as evident from the Word of God, based on common sense, universal values and the principles of natural justice.

Common sense may not be common but it exists.

Streets . . .

The Federal Court has previously declared that only what has been incorporated from MAโ€™63, in the Federal Constitution, is law.

No court will compel compliance on a contract. At best it can only offer compensation. It must be quantified at the assistant registrar’s office.

MA’63 is an international Treaty or Agreement.

Political matters must be settled politically, not in a court of law.

In law, a gov’t on paper can do whatever it wants unless restrained by the court or by the people taking to the streets.

Administrative law — gov’t policy in action which has been gazetted — is about gov’t doing whatever it wants.

The court may be in cahoots — for want of a better term — with the gov’t on administrative law when it does not consider, during judicial review, whether gov’t policies are fair. It does not go into the merits of the Application.

The court in Malaysia only considers whether the gov’t has complied with its own procedures. If so, again, it does not go into the merits of judicial review Applications.

Invariably, the gov’t wins judicial review Applications. Lawyers generally mislead Clients on judicial reviews. The lawyers may be using such Applications to get publicity for their practice and “fleece” Clients as much as possible. There’s nothing in the papers when they lose. They allegedly pay court reporters not to carry the news when they fail in court.

I told off a lawyer in Sabah who is the “King of judicial review Applications” for “fleecing” Clients in this manner.

Parliament . . .

Parliament should exercise oversight on administrative laws, and on whether gov’t policies are fair, the process of gazetting, and judicial reviews.

Instead, Parliament confines itself to passing an average 30 Acts a year and debating “irrelevant” issues like whether Health Minister Khairy Jamaluddin was vaccinated, why former Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak was invited by Beijing to address the recent Chinese World Economic Forum and MACC Chief Azam Baki’s shares in publicly listed Companies.

The gov’t in Malaysia takes hundreds, if not thousands, of policy decisions a year. In the UK for example, the gov’t announces about 2K+ administrative laws every year. Parliament can only manage to pass about 70 Acts a year.

However, in England, the court considers whether gov’t policies are fair before going into the merits of judicial review Applications.

The streets II . . .

Kazakhstan is an example of the people taking to the streets. It’s a People’s Movement on multiple issues.

The farmers in India, on the streets for months, is an example of the people taking to the streets. It was about a specific issue: three Agriculture Bills ostensibly designed to modernise agriculture. No surrender no compromise Modi recently agreed to withdraw the Bills.

Wed 6 Jan 2021 in the US was an example of the people taking to the streets. It was about a specific issue: electoral integrity.

The US Supreme Court avoided addressing electoral integrity. It’s the basis of the US Constitution.

Such things happen when the court is unable to find the law and declare it.

The US Supreme Court left it to the states, i.e. the legislature and election officials, to conduct the US 2020 presidential elections.

The court said that “every vote must be counted”. It did not qualify its statement. There were no exceptions, caveats, ifs and buts.

In practice, this means that the votes of illegal immigrants, the deceased, votes brought by ballot harvesters, late votes, and votes allegedly manipulated by machines can be counted, subject to the prerogative and discretionary powers of the states.

In law, a line must be drawn somewhere, lest Pandora’s Box opens.

No court will allow the floodgates to open.

Many states in the US, in the wake of US 2020, have put in place laws to ensure electoral integrity. CNN, petrified and hysterical like the Democrats, has been running amok night after night on the issue and claims that “unvaccinated people are infecting those vaccinated”.

Biden wants to put in place a Federal law against what the states are doing on electoral integrity. It will never happen as Democrats don’t have the numbers. Also, the US Supreme Court has already declared, in finding the law in this case, that the conduct of the US Presidential election must be left to the states. It may have taken this position since the electoral college system is based in the states.

The US President is elected directly by the electoral college system. The national popular votes has no place in electing the US President.

Americans don’t elect the President directly. Indirectly, they vote for someone who can manage the economy.

The US President wears another hat, i.e. foreign affairs, where he or she has carte blanc to kill as many foreigners as possible and bomb any country to thy kingdom come or back to the Stone Age, ostensibly based on “keeping the American people from harm”, human rights, sovereignty and territorial integrity, bringing democracy, the global security framework and world peace a la Pax Americana.

Charity begins at home. If America does not resolve the electoral integrity issue, there will be another civil war come US 2024, if not sooner, which will end in the 3rd American Revolution i.e. after the War of Independence and the 1st Civil War.

The first civil war wasn’t over slavery as widely believed but the south having a disproportionate share of the political power under the system of slavery. Slaves, being not free, were denied the right to vote. They were treated as personal property of the slave owners who owned large plantations. It has been alleged that they raped the slaves with impunity.

Therein lies shades of the Brahmin created Hindu evil caste system which prohibits upward social mobility and inter-caste marriage.

The Pariah — casteless/outcaste — were confined to dirty, difficult, dangerous, demeaning and humiliating jobs forever.

Brahmin and caste Hindu allegedly rape Pariah women with impunity. Apparently, caste Hindu making up the force, the police look the other way if Pariah women are raped.

India is the rape capital of the world.

Extraordinary event . . .

If a Revolution takes place, the Constitution has been torn up. A new Constitution has to be drawn up.

Constitutions follow an extraordinary event. Examples include civil war, war, secession, partition, independence and Revolution.

Egypt, after the Arab Spring, had two Revolutions. Two Constitutions were drawn up.

Constitution isn’t law but as the ultimate political document, setting forth the governing institutions of state, it has force of law, and emerges as the supreme law of the land.

Likewise, Adat isn’t law but it has force of law, being based on customary practices.

Adat is the 1st law in international law. Human rights is the basis of international law. It derives from international customary practices.

It’s not necessary for Adat to be incorporated in the Constitution.

NCR land cases in Sabah and Sarawak, for example, should begin in the Land Office, move to the Native Court and end at the High Court, the appellate court for the inferior court. NCR land cases can’t begin in the High Court. It has no jurisdiction.

If NCR land cases begin in the High Court, it may end up in the Federal Court in Review. Invariably, the Orang Asal lose such cases. Apparently, the superior courts may not “recognise” Adat on the grounds that “it isn’t law”.

Jurisdiction . . .

I watched an associate, senior lawyer Rakhbir Singh, argue for five hours in the High Court of Borneo on jurisdiction.

That was quite some time ago.

Five lawyers were on the other side.

They were making oral submission.

Rakhbir told the judge that the High Court has no jurisdiction on NCR land cases.

He stressed the same point, over and over again from many angles, for five hours.

Finally, the Judge ruled in favour of Rakhbir. He said in a two-liner, “I have to agree with Rakhbir. The High Court has no jurisdiction on NCR land cases”.

Orang Asal aren’t about race, DNA or geographical origin but ancestral and historical property, i.e. NCR land, protected by Adat and Article I61A, 13, 8 and 5.

The Orang Asal have NCR land by the right of first settlement, and working the land, in the emptiness and vastness of a geographical expanse bound by water, mountain and jungle.

Orang Asal existed before modern gov’t.

The right of first settlement is operation of law.

In the rule of law, the basis of the Constitution, there’s greater emphasis on the spirit of the law, read with the letter of the law.

The letter of the law, by itself, isn’t law at all.

There must be a basis for comparison.

We can’t compare apples and oranges.

If we understand Definition, and thesis statement, we would be better placed to connect the dots for the Way Forward on relevant facts, the issues arising, and the law/s applicable.

The following on operation of law is an extract from wikipedia and may have relevance in court . . .

Operation of law is a way in which someone gets certain rights (or sometimes responsibilities) automatically under the law without taking action, requiring cooperation from another person, or being the subject of a court order.

Operation of law can also describe what a person can or cannot do, or what rights or interests a person has.

Therein lies the case for letters of representation to the AGC and AG on matters in court.